Re: [PATCH] rtnl: Simplify ASSERT_RTNL

Patrick McHardy
2007-09-29T17:51:41Z

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Regardless of the correctness of where we have ASSERT_RTNL.
> I think not actually taking the mutex on the assertion failure path
> (just so we can release it), is still a good deal regardless.

Agreed. I actually have an identical patch somewhere that
I wanted to submit soon.