From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:20:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: References: <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com> <1269570902.9614.92.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com> <1270114166.2078.107.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> <1270195589.2078.116.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> <4BBA8DF9.8010409@kernel.org> <1270542497.2078.123.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> <1270591841.2091.170.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1270607668.2078.259.camel@ymzhang.sh.intel.com> <4BBCB7B7.4040901@cs.helsinki.fi> <4BBCB868.2000705@cs.helsinki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" , Eric Dumazet , netdev , Tejun Heo , alex.shi@intel.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Ma, Ling" , "Chen, Tim C" , Andrew Morton To: Pekka Enberg Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BBCB868.2000705@cs.helsinki.fi> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Oh, sorry, I think it's actually '____cacheline_aligned_in_smp' (with four > underscores) for per-cpu data. Confusing... This does not particulary help to clarify the situation since we are dealing with data that can either be allocated via the percpu allocator or be statically present (kmalloc bootstrap situation).