From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:3357, kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:43:10 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: References: <20111121131531.GA1679@x4.trippels.de> <1321884966.10470.2.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <20111121153621.GA1678@x4.trippels.de> <1321890510.10470.11.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <20111121161036.GA1679@x4.trippels.de> <1321894353.10470.19.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <1321895706.10470.21.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <20111121173556.GA1673@x4.trippels.de> <1321900743.10470.31.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <20111121185215.GA1673@x4.trippels.de> <20111121195113.GA1678@x4.trippels.de> <1321907275.13860.12.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Markus Trippelsdorf , Eric Dumazet , "Alex,Shi" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Matt Mackall , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Tejun Heo , Christian Kujau To: Pekka Enberg Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Does CONFIG_SLAB make all the issues go away or are you still able to > reproduce corruption with it? I'm asking because we have the per-cpu > partial list patches in 3.2-rc1 and I'd like to rule them out as a > suspect. SLAB does not have the same capabilities to detect corruption. You can disable most the cpu partial functionality by setting /sys/kernel/slab/*/cpu_partial to 0