From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: slub: Lockout validation scans during freeing of object Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:40:48 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: References: <1321982484.18002.6.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Markus Trippelsdorf , Christian Kujau , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , "Alex,Shi" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Pekka Enberg , Matt Mackall , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Tejun Heo To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1321982484.18002.6.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote: > This seems better, but I still have some warnings : Trying to reproduce with a kernel configured to do preempt. This is actually quite interesting since its always off by 1. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org