From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [patch] xen-netback: double free on unload
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:31:31 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306240830580.2215@hadrien>
References: <20130621062008.GA10873@elgon.mountain> <20130624.002607.1816906327683052502.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: dan.carpenter@oracle.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130624.002607.1816906327683052502.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, David Miller wrote:

> From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:20:08 +0300
>
> > There is a typo here, "i" vs "j", so we would crash on module_exit().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> Please always explicitly state the tree for which a patch is
> applicable.
>
> Here I figured it out by trial an error, trying to apply it
> to 'net' (where it failed) and then 'net-next' (where it
> applied cleanly).
>
> I should never have to play patch monkey games like that, you
> need to tell me where a patch is targetted.

Shouldn't one always, by default, work on linux-next?

julia