From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julia Lawall Subject: Re: question about netif_rx Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:18:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20130811155640.GA10070@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20130813052036.GA11640@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20130813204131.GA4696@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Francois Romieu , David Shwatrz , Julia Lawall , grant.likely@linaro.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, Netdev , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org To: Rami Rosen Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 Aug 2013, Rami Rosen wrote: > Hi, > BTW, this is not the only NAPI issue here. When looking into cleanup > of resources in this driver, a call to netif_napi_del() is missing > (though there is a call to napi_disable(), which is not enough for > proper cleanup). Actually, netif_napi_del seems to be quite underused. At least approximately, I would assume that every file that uses netif_napi_add should use netif_napi_del at least once, and possible more times. But I find 118 .c files that use netif_napi_add, and only 35 that use netif_napi_del. Are there some cases where it might not be needed? julia