From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>,
Benedikt Spranger <b.spranger@linutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/12] can: c_can: Fix a series of serious bugs and improve the performance
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 00:35:24 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403312355280.14882@ionos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140318171007.528610837@linutronix.de>
Dear Maintainers,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The driver is full of serious bugs:
>
> - Two HW init routines are not spec compliant.
>
> - Completely defective message buffer handling in several ways
> That leads to interrupt storms and complete lockups.
>
> - Complete lack of SMP awareness
>
> What's amazing is that people "optimize" and "fix" the driver over and
> over, but nobody bothered to understand the manual and repair the code
> for real.
>
> The series fixes _ALL_ bugs which I found so far, but I'm sure there
> are more issues burried in that unreadable mess. I'm just not able to
> trigger them.
What's the state of this series?
The only reaction so far was a hasty commit of cosmetic add ons to my
findings at [1] accompanied with the following mail which was not a
direct reply to my patches but merily a new mail to the can mailing
list:
" Subject: [PATCH 1/2] can: c_can: improve error checking
as mentioned in the other mail, a patch that adds return value
checking to all users of c_can_set_bittiming(). Another patch adds
the missing netif_napi_del(). Feel free to include the patches in
your series or use the testing-c_can branch [1] as your git base.
"
I'm really grateful, that you allowed me to include these patches to
my series. But that does not help anything at all:
- The driver is still broken as it has been for years
- You as the maintainer reacted by submitting a pointless patch to
base my series on instead of applying the obvious and well
documented bug fixes right away.
- Just for the record, the series fixes the fatal issues of that
driver with and without the extra cosmetic fixes which are just a
supplement for the real issues.
What's going on here? Are we going to have another few kernel
releases with a completely defunct driver in place?
Thanks,
tglx
---
[1] git://gitorious.org/linux-can/linux-can-next.git testing-c_can
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-31 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-18 17:19 [patch 00/12] can: c_can: Fix a series of serious bugs and improve the performance Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:19 ` [patch 01/12] can: c_can: Wait for CONTROL_INIT to be cleared Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 18:11 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-03-18 18:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:19 ` [patch 02/12] can: c_can: Fix hardware raminit function Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 18:38 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-03-18 22:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-19 6:37 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-03-19 9:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:19 ` [patch 03/12] can: c_can: Make it SMP safe Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 18:46 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-03-18 19:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:19 ` [patch 04/12] can: c_can: Fix buffer ordering for real Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:19 ` [patch 05/12] can: c_can: Fix the lost message handling Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:19 ` [patch 06/12] can: c_can: Remove braindamaged EOB exit Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:19 ` [patch 08/12] can: c_can: Makethe code readable Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:37 ` Joe Perches
2014-03-18 18:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 18:27 ` [patch 08/12 V2] " Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:19 ` [patch 07/12] can: c_can: Provide protection in the xmit path Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:19 ` [patch 09/12] can: c_can: Reduce register access for real Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:19 ` [patch 10/12] can: c_can: Store dlc private Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:19 ` [patch 11/12] can: c_can: Simplify TX interrupt cleanup Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 17:19 ` [patch 12/12] can: c_can: Avoid led toggling for every packet Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 20:18 ` can: c_can: Reduce interrupt load by 50% Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 20:35 ` Joe Perches
2014-03-18 20:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-03-18 21:27 ` Joe Perches
2014-03-31 22:35 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2014-04-01 8:09 ` [patch 00/12] can: c_can: Fix a series of serious bugs and improve the performance Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-01 9:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-01 9:09 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-01 21:29 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1403312355280.14882@ionos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=b.spranger@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=mpa@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).