From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julia Lawall Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 23:26:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20150902.223522.1792493140210966693.davem@davemloft.net> <20150903.104032.767889134756094076.davem@davemloft.net> <1441305296.9666.14.camel@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Joe Perches , David Miller , Lorenzo Bianconi , Johannes Berg , Andrew Morton , Network Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > There are 32 2-dimensional arrays in function parameters, and 1 > > 3-dimensional array. No 4-dimensional arrays. I didn't check past that. > > None of these has a sizeof or ARRAY_SIZE. > > > > The three dimensional array is here: drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0367.c > > Ok. That actually looks like a valid use of the C function argument > array passing semantics. It's rather much simpler than exposing the > pointers. > > So I guess we don't really end up wanting to disallow this, and the > new gcc array sizeof warning is good enough. > > Thanks for running the analysis so that I didn't have to look at it ;) The double arrays also look OK - the uses are also explicit double array references. julia