From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] reciprocal_divide: correction/update of the algorithm Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:37:37 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: References: <1389828228-30312-1-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> <1389828228-30312-3-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Frederic Sowa , Eric Dumazet , Austin S Hemmelgarn , Jesse Gross , Jamal Hadi Salim , Stephen Hemminger , Matt Mackall , Pekka Enberg , Andy Gospodarek , Veaceslav Falico , Jay Vosburgh , Jakub Zawadzki To: Daniel Borkmann Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1389828228-30312-3-git-send-email-dborkman@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > - * or else the performance is slower than a normal divide. > - */ > -extern u32 reciprocal_value(u32 B); > +struct reciprocal_value { > + u32 m; > + u8 sh1, sh2; > +}; > > +#define RECIPROCAL_VALUE_RESULT_TO_ZERO ((struct reciprocal_value){.sh1 = 32}) > > -static inline u32 reciprocal_divide(u32 A, u32 R) > +struct reciprocal_value reciprocal_value(u32 d); A function that returns a struct? That works? Which gcc versions support it?