From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] time: Add driver cross timestamp interface for higher precision time synchronization Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:54:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <1456139726-3327-1-git-send-email-christopher.s.hall@intel.com> <1456139726-3327-5-git-send-email-christopher.s.hall@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: richardcochran@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, hpa@zytor.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kevin.b.stanton@intel.com, kevin.j.clarke@intel.com To: "Christopher S. Hall" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1456139726-3327-5-git-send-email-christopher.s.hall@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Christopher S. Hall wrote: > +int get_device_system_crosststamp(int (*get_time_fn) > + (ktime_t *device_time, > + struct system_counterval_t *sys_counterval, > + void *ctx), > + void *ctx, > + struct system_device_crosststamp *xtstamp) > +{ > + struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper; > + unsigned long seq; > + struct system_counterval_t system_counterval; > + ktime_t base_raw; > + ktime_t base_real; > + s64 nsec_raw; > + s64 nsec_real; Single lines for same and desceding length ordered, which makes it simpler to parse, please. Other than that: Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner