From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc1: BUG_ON in kmap_atomic_prot() Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20070723204045.GD5755@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> <20070723210153.GA5753@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> <20070723141137.171e4ac1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070724175951.GC6019@stusta.de> <20070724112843.0cc104c2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070724194046.GD6019@stusta.de> <20070726180721.GN3572@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Alexey Dobriyan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian Bunk Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:42418 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934854AbXGZST6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:19:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070726180721.GN3572@stusta.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > So maybe I'm old-fashioned and crazy, but "readability of the asm result" > > actually is a worthwhile goal. Not because we care directly, but because > > I'd like to encourage people to do it, due to the *indirect* benefits. > > This would lead to people trying to optimize code for one gcc version - > and the code might stay this way for 10 years. No. The fact is, code that is easy to optimize is easy to optimize. It has _nothing_ to do with gcc versions. Linus