From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] make atomic_t volatile on all architectures Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20070808230733.GA17270@shell.boston.redhat.com> <46BAC2BE.1090106@redhat.com> <46BB508B.7050601@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chris Snook , akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, wensong@linux-vs.org, horms@verge.net.au, wjiang@resilience.com, cfriesen@nortel.com, zlynx@acm.org To: Chuck Ebbert Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:39799 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750763AbXHISBi (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:01:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46BB508B.7050601@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > You can use this forget() macro to make the compiler reread a variable: > > #define forget(var) asm volatile ("" : "=m"(var)) No. That will also make the compiler "forget" any previous writes to it, so it changes behaviour. You'd have to use "+m". Linus