From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Robert P. J. Day" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] [SCTP]: "list_for_each()" -> "list_for_each_entry()" where appropriate. Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:46:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <1207856394-19321-1-git-send-email-vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> <1207856394-19321-3-git-send-email-vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Vlad Yasevich Return-path: Received: from astoria.ccjclearline.com ([64.235.106.9]:59094 "EHLO astoria.ccjclearline.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756029AbYDJTqo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:46:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1207856394-19321-3-git-send-email-vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: actually, if i remember correctly, davem rejected that change as being too disruptive at the moment, no? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry: Have classroom, will lecture. http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA ========================================================================