From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: PJ Waskiewicz <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARCH: Fix 32-bit x86 MSI-X allocation leakage
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:30:25 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804282216570.3261@apollo.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080426005850.7098.77479.stgit@scrappy.jf.intel.com>
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, PJ Waskiewicz wrote:
> This bug was introduced in the 2.6.24 i386/x86_64 tree merge, where
Can you please explain what exactly caused the bug. Definitely not the
move from arch/i386 to arch/x86 as the code there was not changed at
all and has not be changed since then.
CC'ed Eric as well.
Thanks
tglx
> MSI-X vector allocation will eventually fail. The cause is the new
> bit array tracking used vectors is not getting cleared properly on
> IRQ destruction on the 32-bit APIC code.
>
> This can be seen easily using the ixgbe 10 GbE driver on multi-core
> systems by simply loading and unloading the driver a few times.
> Depending on the number of available vectors on the host system, the
> MSI-X allocation will eventually fail, and the driver will only be
> able to use legacy interrupts.
>
> I am generating the same patch for both stable trees for 2.6.24 and
> 2.6.25.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
> ---
>
> arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c
> index 2e2f420..77798b1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_32.c
> @@ -2444,6 +2444,7 @@ void destroy_irq(unsigned int irq)
> dynamic_irq_cleanup(irq);
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags);
> + clear_bit(irq_vector[irq], used_vectors);
> irq_vector[irq] = 0;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags);
> }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-28 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-26 0:58 [PATCH] ARCH: Fix 32-bit x86 MSI-X allocation leakage PJ Waskiewicz
2008-04-28 19:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-04-28 21:27 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2008-04-28 20:30 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2008-04-28 20:42 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2008-04-28 21:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-28 21:21 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2008-04-29 10:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-29 15:07 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2008-04-29 15:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-30 0:16 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0804282216570.3261@apollo.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).