From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"arjan@linux.jf.intel.com" <arjan@linux.jf.intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC: linux-next 1/2] irq: Add CPU mask affinity hint callback framework
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:48:24 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004292121310.2951@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272563946.9614.1.camel@localhost>
B1;2005;0cPeter,
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Peter P Waskiewicz Jr wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 09:45 -0700, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > So you need a reference to your device, so what about the following:
> >
> > struct irq_affinity_hint;
> >
> > struct irq_affinity_hint {
> > unsigned int (*callback)(unsigned int irq, struct irq_affinity_hint *hint,
> > cpumask_var_t *mask);
> > }
> >
> > Now you embed that struct into your device private data structure and
> > you get the reference to it back in the callback function. No extra
> > kmalloc/kfree, less code.
>
> Good idea! I'll roll that into my new version.
Thinking more about it, I wonder whether you have a cpu_mask in your
driver/device private data anyway. I bet you have :)
So it should be sufficient to set a pointer to that cpu_mask in
irq_desc and get rid of the callback completely.
Any access to desc->affinity_hint needs to be protected by desc->lock.
For setting the pointer to a real mask resp. NULL that's fine. The
copy which you need to do in the proc-read function is not going to
introduce huge latencies either.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-29 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-19 4:57 [PATCH RFC: linux-next 1/2] irq: Add CPU mask affinity hint callback framework Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2010-04-19 4:58 ` [PATCH RFC: linux-next 2/2] ixgbe: Example usage of the new IRQ affinity_hint callback Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2010-04-21 2:28 ` [PATCH RFC: linux-next 1/2] irq: Add CPU mask affinity hint callback framework David Miller
2010-04-27 12:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-27 16:04 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2010-04-28 16:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-29 17:59 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2010-04-29 19:48 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2010-04-29 20:28 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2010-04-29 20:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-29 21:29 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1004292121310.2951@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=arjan@linux.jf.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox