From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v4 2/2] ixgbe: Example usage of the new IRQ affinity_hint callback Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:47:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20100430214445.3992.41647.stgit@ppwaskie-hc2.jf.intel.com> <20100430214517.3992.92545.stgit@ppwaskie-hc2.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: davem@davemloft.net, arjan@linux.jf.intel.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100430214517.3992.92545.stgit@ppwaskie-hc2.jf.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Peter P Waskiewicz Jr wrote: > + for (i = 0; i < num_q_vectors; i++) { > + struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector = adapter->q_vector[i]; > + /* release the CPU mask memory */ > + free_cpumask_var(q_vector->affinity_mask); > + /* clear the affinity_mask in the IRQ descriptor */ > + irq_set_affinity_hint(adapter->msix_entries[i].vector, NULL); Freeing the mask _AFTER_ clearing the hint might be a worthwhile exercise :) Thanks, tglx