From: Vivek Kashyap <kashyapv@us.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@cisco.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@redhat.com,
Jens Osterkamp <Jens.Osterkamp@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/2] add ndo_set_port_profile op support for enic dynamic vnics
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 09:18:57 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005030817210.5203@vk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005031332.34955.arnd@arndb.de>
> Yes, that's exactly what I wrote. So do you have any idea why we would
> ever not want to do the resource reservation?
I agree that resource reservation is preferable during migration since it
avoids failure due to lack of resources at the switch (after doing all the
work of state transfer to the target system).
In other scenarios where the period of resource reservation is long,
thereby diminishing the number of active vsi flows, the management
entity might choose not to use resource reservation.
Vivek
>
> Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-28 4:42 [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/2] Add netdev port-profile support (take III, was iovnl) Scott Feldman
2010-04-28 4:42 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/2] add ndo_set_port_profile op support for enic dynamic vnics Scott Feldman
2010-04-28 13:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-28 18:39 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-28 19:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-28 22:38 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-29 12:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-29 14:32 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-29 15:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-29 16:31 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-30 20:34 ` Scott Feldman
2010-05-01 12:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-03 4:29 ` Vivek Kashyap
2010-05-03 11:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-03 16:18 ` Vivek Kashyap [this message]
2010-04-28 13:13 ` [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/2] Add netdev port-profile support (take III, was iovnl) Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-28 17:51 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-28 19:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-28 18:54 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-28 19:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1005030817210.5203@vk \
--to=kashyapv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Jens.Osterkamp@gmx.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scofeldm@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox