From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] dec netdev: relocate DIGITAL based drivers to legacy Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:50:17 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20101028.212939.189691515.davem@davemloft.net> <20101028.224703.112589527.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org ([78.24.191.182]:57916 "EHLO cvs.linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752484Ab0J2FuT (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2010 01:50:19 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:47355 "EHLO localhost.localdomain" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1491016Ab0J2FuR (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:50:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20101028.224703.112589527.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, David Miller wrote: > This patch series started with a "0/15" introduction posting which > explains the intention and reasoning. Well, I didn't reach it (ENOBREAKFAST that has been fixed since ;) ), but I sort of guessed it anyway and didn't like the arbitrary nature of assigning drivers to legacy/. > It might be easier for you to read it instead of asking me to repeat > it's contents :-) See my proposal that crossed with your e-mail. I think it fits the purpose very well. :) Maciej