From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] netfilter: avoid double seq_adjust for loopback
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:31:05 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1106080926320.1457@ja.ssi.bg> (raw)
Avoid double seq adjustment for loopback traffic
because it causes silent repetition of TCP data. One
example is passive FTP with DNAT rule and difference in the
length of IP addresses.
This patch adds check if packet is sent and
received via loopback device. As the same conntrack is
used both for outgoing and incoming direction, we restrict
seq adjustment to happen only in POSTROUTING.
Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
---
diff -urp v2.6.39/linux/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h linux/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
--- v2.6.39/linux/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h 2011-05-20 10:38:04.000000000 +0300
+++ linux/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h 2011-06-08 08:29:58.880272586 +0300
@@ -308,6 +308,12 @@ static inline int nf_ct_is_untracked(con
return test_bit(IPS_UNTRACKED_BIT, &ct->status);
}
+/* Packet is received from loopback */
+static inline bool nf_is_loopback_packet(const struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ return skb->dev && skb->skb_iif && skb->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK;
+}
+
extern int nf_conntrack_set_hashsize(const char *val, struct kernel_param *kp);
extern unsigned int nf_conntrack_htable_size;
extern unsigned int nf_conntrack_max;
diff -urp v2.6.39/linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c
--- v2.6.39/linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c 2010-08-02 09:37:49.000000000 +0300
+++ linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c 2011-06-08 08:34:15.594269592 +0300
@@ -121,7 +121,9 @@ static unsigned int ipv4_confirm(unsigne
return ret;
}
- if (test_bit(IPS_SEQ_ADJUST_BIT, &ct->status)) {
+ /* adjust seqs for loopback traffic only in outgoing direction */
+ if (test_bit(IPS_SEQ_ADJUST_BIT, &ct->status) &&
+ !nf_is_loopback_packet(skb)) {
typeof(nf_nat_seq_adjust_hook) seq_adjust;
seq_adjust = rcu_dereference(nf_nat_seq_adjust_hook);
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-08 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-08 6:31 Julian Anastasov [this message]
2011-06-16 15:30 ` [PATCH v2] netfilter: avoid double seq_adjust for loopback Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1106080926320.1457@ja.ssi.bg \
--to=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox