From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Subject: Re[2]:  [PATCH V3 0/8] ipvs: IPv6 fragment handling for  IPVS
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:23:50 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1209141121260.1551@ja.ssi.bg>
References: <ee5vnhe.0891bc4ff9e38f64c4c5c0da6c50af1c@obelix.schillstrom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	Hans Schillstrom <hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
	Wensong Zhang <wensong@linux-vs.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Hans Schillstrom <hans@schillstrom.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ja.ssi.bg ([178.16.129.10]:57290 "EHLO ja.ssi.bg"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755628Ab2INIUx (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 04:20:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <ee5vnhe.0891bc4ff9e38f64c4c5c0da6c50af1c@obelix.schillstrom.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>


	Hello,

On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Hans Schillstrom wrote:

> >	I also see that we should not send ICMP
> >errors (FRAG NEEDED/TOO BIG) in response to large
> >ICMP error packets but it is not related to your changes,
> >it needs separate change to all transmitters.
> 
> Just a curious question, have you seen such big ICMP packets in real life ?
> (if you have normal MTU:s) 

	No, may be it can happen when PMTU reaches minimum.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>