From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julian Anastasov Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 01/15] net: add skb_dst_set_unref Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:05:56 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: References: <1362863815-5898-2-git-send-email-ja@ssi.bg> <20130310.051735.1281635372029510938.davem@davemloft.net> <20130310.170004.2239870728229481365.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: horms@verge.net.au, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130310.170004.2239870728229481365.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: lvs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hello, On Sun, 10 Mar 2013, David Miller wrote: > From: Julian Anastasov > Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:37:34 +0200 (EET) > > > The idea looks good, here is the implementation. > > Can I use it in this form for next patchset versions? > > Yes, but with one minor change: > > > - if (unlikely(dst->flags & DST_NOCACHE)) { > > + if (unlikely(dst->flags & DST_NOCACHE && !force)) { > > I keep forgetting the && vs. & operator precedence, and so > do many other people, so please put parenthesis around > the "dst->flags & DST_NOCACHE" expression, thanks. Done, I'll wait a week for more feedback... Regards -- Julian Anastasov