From: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@intel.com>
To: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@gmail.com>
Cc: Joseph Gasparakis <joseph.gasparakis@intel.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>,
Yan Burman <yanb@mellanox.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: extending ndo_add_rx_vxlan_port
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:59:12 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1310281049210.31450@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZOPZLAg+5dYS=bUCkDMyYq8EmA_uvEv1Zi+drq6Qqe5onrzQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Joseph Gasparakis wrote:
>
> > VXLAN implementation is not done like VLAN. VLANs are stacked on top of
> > real interfaces and what you are saying makes sense. VXLAN however is
> > using ip[6]_tunnel_xmit, and this is why we need to notify all the
>
> As the name of the ndo you added ndo_add_rx_vxlan_port suggests -- HW
> needs that for RX offloads. So basically, what I am saying is: in a
> similar manner that we already program the NIC "over which" the vxlan
> instance is set to listen on the multicast address which is associated
> with that vxlan segement, lets give them a hint that packets arriving
> on this group are vxlan ones, so they can use it for programming
> steering rules.
Why don't you write up some code so everyone has something to look at?
Then we can see what makes sense to do in terms of the existing or new
ndos.
>
>
> > netdevs in the system that implement the add/del vxlan port ndo (i.e. are
> > capable of offloading inner csums). In effect all physical "real" netdevs
> > are candidates to receive/transmit VXLAN traffic, subject to routing
> > tables changing or not.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-28 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-27 15:21 extending ndo_add_rx_vxlan_port Or Gerlitz
2013-10-27 17:25 ` Joseph Gasparakis
2013-10-27 20:34 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-10-27 23:41 ` John Fastabend
2013-10-27 23:44 ` Joseph Gasparakis
2013-10-28 7:35 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-10-28 17:59 ` Joseph Gasparakis [this message]
2013-10-28 18:19 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-10-28 20:24 ` Joseph Gasparakis
2013-10-28 21:13 ` Joseph Gasparakis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.03.1310281049210.31450@intel.com \
--to=joseph.gasparakis@intel.com \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=or.gerlitz@gmail.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=yanb@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).