public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Linux kernel netdev mailing list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: is "volatile" the cause of ifconfig flags not matching sysfs flags?
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 18:32:36 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1808221824460.5035@localhost.localdomain> (raw)


  almost certainly another dumb question, but i was poking around the
sysfs, particularly /sys/class/net/<ifname>/*, to familiarize myself
with what i can glean (or set) re interfaces under /sys, and i noticed
"flags", but what i get there doesn't match what i get by running
ifconfig.

  specifically, if i list the flags for my wireless interface under
/sys:

$ cat flags
0x1003
$

  but with ifconfig:

$ ifconfig wlp2s0
wlp2s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
              ^^^^

  do those two "flags" values represent the same set of flags? and
does the obvious difference have to do with some of those flags being
"volatile" as dewscribed in include/uapi/linux/if.h? or am i just
totally misreading this?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                  http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

             reply	other threads:[~2018-08-23  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-22 22:32 Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2018-08-22 22:53 ` is "volatile" the cause of ifconfig flags not matching sysfs flags? Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-23 11:50   ` Robert P. J. Day

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.21.1808221824460.5035@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox