netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Linux kernel netdev mailing list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: is "volatile" the cause of ifconfig flags not matching sysfs flags?
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:50:38 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1808230750001.19157@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180822155322.335bd34c@xeon-e3>

On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 18:32:36 -0400 (EDT)
> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>
> >   almost certainly another dumb question, but i was poking around the
> > sysfs, particularly /sys/class/net/<ifname>/*, to familiarize myself
> > with what i can glean (or set) re interfaces under /sys, and i noticed
> > "flags", but what i get there doesn't match what i get by running
> > ifconfig.
> >
> >   specifically, if i list the flags for my wireless interface under
> > /sys:
> >
> > $ cat flags
> > 0x1003
> > $
> >
> >   but with ifconfig:
> >
> > $ ifconfig wlp2s0
> > wlp2s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
> >               ^^^^
> >
> >   do those two "flags" values represent the same set of flags? and
> > does the obvious difference have to do with some of those flags being
> > "volatile" as dewscribed in include/uapi/linux/if.h? or am i just
> > totally misreading this?
> >
> > rday
> >
>
> sysfs reports netdevice->if_flags where as ifconfig is getting hex
> value from SIOCGIFFLAGS which does:
> 	dev_get_flags(dev)
>
> The value in sysfs is more intended for internal debugging, where
> all the normal userspace API's return a more limited set of
> historical values.

  so the history aside, those values ultimately represent the same
flags?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                  http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

      reply	other threads:[~2018-08-23 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-22 22:32 is "volatile" the cause of ifconfig flags not matching sysfs flags? Robert P. J. Day
2018-08-22 22:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-23 11:50   ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.21.1808230750001.19157@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).