From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Linux kernel netdev mailing list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: is "volatile" the cause of ifconfig flags not matching sysfs flags?
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:50:38 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1808230750001.19157@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180822155322.335bd34c@xeon-e3>
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 18:32:36 -0400 (EDT)
> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>
> > almost certainly another dumb question, but i was poking around the
> > sysfs, particularly /sys/class/net/<ifname>/*, to familiarize myself
> > with what i can glean (or set) re interfaces under /sys, and i noticed
> > "flags", but what i get there doesn't match what i get by running
> > ifconfig.
> >
> > specifically, if i list the flags for my wireless interface under
> > /sys:
> >
> > $ cat flags
> > 0x1003
> > $
> >
> > but with ifconfig:
> >
> > $ ifconfig wlp2s0
> > wlp2s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> > ^^^^
> >
> > do those two "flags" values represent the same set of flags? and
> > does the obvious difference have to do with some of those flags being
> > "volatile" as dewscribed in include/uapi/linux/if.h? or am i just
> > totally misreading this?
> >
> > rday
> >
>
> sysfs reports netdevice->if_flags where as ifconfig is getting hex
> value from SIOCGIFFLAGS which does:
> dev_get_flags(dev)
>
> The value in sysfs is more intended for internal debugging, where
> all the normal userspace API's return a more limited set of
> historical values.
so the history aside, those values ultimately represent the same
flags?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-23 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-22 22:32 is "volatile" the cause of ifconfig flags not matching sysfs flags? Robert P. J. Day
2018-08-22 22:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-23 11:50 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.21.1808230750001.19157@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).