netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@gmx.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@gmx.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ssujith@cisco.com,
	gvaradar@cisco.com, benve@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] enic: alloc/free rx_cpu_rmap
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:22:21 +0530 (IST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.03.1406101900400.2499@ws.cisco> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <539600A8.3010703@cogentembedded.com>



On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

> @@ -1192,6 +1195,33 @@ static void enic_calc_int_moderation(struct enic 
>> *enic, struct vnic_rq *rq)
>>   	pkt_size_counter->small_pkt_bytes_cnt = 0;
>>   }
>> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
>> +static void enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
>> +{
>> +	free_irq_cpu_rmap(enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap);
>> +	enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap = NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void enic_set_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
>
>   No need to use *inline* in a .c file, the compiler should figure it out.
>

Yes, I agree.

>> +{
>> +	int i, res;
>> +
>> +	if (vnic_dev_get_intr_mode(enic->vdev) == VNIC_DEV_INTR_MODE_MSIX) {
>> +		enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap = 
>> alloc_irq_cpu_rmap(enic->rq_count);
>> +		if (unlikely(!enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap))
>> +			return;
>> +		for (i = 0; i < enic->rq_count; i++) {
>> +			res = irq_cpu_rmap_add(enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap,
>> +					       enic->msix_entry[i].vector);
>> +			if (unlikely(res)) {
>> +				enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(enic);
>> +				return;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +}
>
>   It's better to do the following here:
>
> #else
> static void enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
> {
> }
> static void enic_set_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
> {
> }
>

How about

static void enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
...
...
#endif
}

I prefer this over yours because, if I use yours tools like cscope finds two
definitions of function enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap. Which makes code walk through
little bit difficult.

Thanks
Govind

>> +#endif
>> +
>>   static int enic_poll_msix(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>>   {
>>   	struct net_device *netdev = napi->dev;
>> @@ -1267,6 +1297,9 @@ static void enic_free_intr(struct enic *enic)
>>   	struct net_device *netdev = enic->netdev;
>>   	unsigned int i;
>> 
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
>> +	enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(enic);
>> +#endif
>
>   ... so that you can avoid #ifdef's at the call sites.
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-10 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-09 18:32 [PATCH net-next 0/8] enic updates Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] flow_keys: Record IP layer protocol in skb_flow_dissect() Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-10 13:11   ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-06-10 14:08     ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-10 14:26       ` Eric Dumazet
2014-06-11 22:06         ` David Miller
2014-06-11 22:08           ` David Miller
2014-06-12  5:38             ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-19 18:06   ` Chema Gonzalez
2014-06-19 18:52     ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-24  5:29   ` Yinghai Lu
2014-06-26  6:34     ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-09-18 14:18       ` Or Gerlitz
2014-09-18 14:38         ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 15:02         ` [PATCH net] net: sched: shrink struct qdisc_skb_cb to 28 bytes Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 16:26           ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-09-18 16:32             ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 18:00               ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 18:07                 ` Joe Perches
2014-09-18 19:14                   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 19:31                     ` Joe Perches
2014-09-18 20:31                       ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 21:28               ` Or Gerlitz
2014-09-18 22:29           ` [net] " Doug Ledford
2014-09-19 12:07             ` Or Gerlitz
2014-09-22 18:38             ` David Miller
2014-09-22 18:22           ` [PATCH net] " David Miller
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] enic: fix return value in _vnic_dev_cmd Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] enic: devcmd for adding IP 5 tuple hardware filters Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] enic: alloc/free rx_cpu_rmap Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:44   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-10 13:52     ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan [this message]
2014-06-10 15:00       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] enic: Add Accelerated RFS support Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] enic: fix lockdep around devcmd_lock Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] enic: add low latency socket busy_poll support Govindarajulu Varadarajan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.03.1406101900400.2499@ws.cisco \
    --to=_govind@gmx.com \
    --cc=benve@cisco.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gvaradar@cisco.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=ssujith@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).