From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@gmx.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@gmx.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ssujith@cisco.com,
gvaradar@cisco.com, benve@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] enic: alloc/free rx_cpu_rmap
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 19:22:21 +0530 (IST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.03.1406101900400.2499@ws.cisco> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <539600A8.3010703@cogentembedded.com>
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> @@ -1192,6 +1195,33 @@ static void enic_calc_int_moderation(struct enic
>> *enic, struct vnic_rq *rq)
>> pkt_size_counter->small_pkt_bytes_cnt = 0;
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
>> +static void enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
>> +{
>> + free_irq_cpu_rmap(enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap);
>> + enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap = NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void enic_set_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
>
> No need to use *inline* in a .c file, the compiler should figure it out.
>
Yes, I agree.
>> +{
>> + int i, res;
>> +
>> + if (vnic_dev_get_intr_mode(enic->vdev) == VNIC_DEV_INTR_MODE_MSIX) {
>> + enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap =
>> alloc_irq_cpu_rmap(enic->rq_count);
>> + if (unlikely(!enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap))
>> + return;
>> + for (i = 0; i < enic->rq_count; i++) {
>> + res = irq_cpu_rmap_add(enic->netdev->rx_cpu_rmap,
>> + enic->msix_entry[i].vector);
>> + if (unlikely(res)) {
>> + enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(enic);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>
> It's better to do the following here:
>
> #else
> static void enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
> {
> }
> static void enic_set_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
> {
> }
>
How about
static void enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(struct enic *enic)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
...
...
#endif
}
I prefer this over yours because, if I use yours tools like cscope finds two
definitions of function enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap. Which makes code walk through
little bit difficult.
Thanks
Govind
>> +#endif
>> +
>> static int enic_poll_msix(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
>> {
>> struct net_device *netdev = napi->dev;
>> @@ -1267,6 +1297,9 @@ static void enic_free_intr(struct enic *enic)
>> struct net_device *netdev = enic->netdev;
>> unsigned int i;
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
>> + enic_free_rx_cpu_rmap(enic);
>> +#endif
>
> ... so that you can avoid #ifdef's at the call sites.
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-10 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-09 18:32 [PATCH net-next 0/8] enic updates Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] flow_keys: Record IP layer protocol in skb_flow_dissect() Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-10 13:11 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-06-10 14:08 ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-10 14:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-06-11 22:06 ` David Miller
2014-06-11 22:08 ` David Miller
2014-06-12 5:38 ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-19 18:06 ` Chema Gonzalez
2014-06-19 18:52 ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-24 5:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2014-06-26 6:34 ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-09-18 14:18 ` Or Gerlitz
2014-09-18 14:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 15:02 ` [PATCH net] net: sched: shrink struct qdisc_skb_cb to 28 bytes Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 16:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-09-18 16:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 18:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 18:07 ` Joe Perches
2014-09-18 19:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 19:31 ` Joe Perches
2014-09-18 20:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-18 21:28 ` Or Gerlitz
2014-09-18 22:29 ` [net] " Doug Ledford
2014-09-19 12:07 ` Or Gerlitz
2014-09-22 18:38 ` David Miller
2014-09-22 18:22 ` [PATCH net] " David Miller
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] enic: fix return value in _vnic_dev_cmd Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] enic: devcmd for adding IP 5 tuple hardware filters Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] enic: alloc/free rx_cpu_rmap Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:44 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-10 13:52 ` Govindarajulu Varadarajan [this message]
2014-06-10 15:00 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] enic: Add Accelerated RFS support Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] enic: fix lockdep around devcmd_lock Govindarajulu Varadarajan
2014-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] enic: add low latency socket busy_poll support Govindarajulu Varadarajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.03.1406101900400.2499@ws.cisco \
--to=_govind@gmx.com \
--cc=benve@cisco.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gvaradar@cisco.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=ssujith@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).