From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@gmx.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] bnx2x: fix napi poll return value for repoll Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:56:49 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: References: <1421759776-376-1-git-send-email-_govind@gmx.com> <1421759776-376-3-git-send-email-_govind@gmx.com> <1421765480.4832.2.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <1421765644.4832.4.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@gmx.com>, Willem de Bruijn , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ariel.elior@qlogic.com, ssujith@cisco.com, benve@cisco.com To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mout.gmx.com ([74.208.4.200]:54321 "EHLO mout.gmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752919AbbATP1D (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:27:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1421765644.4832.4.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 06:51 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >>> >>> for_each_cos_in_tx_queue(fp, cos) >>> if (bnx2x_tx_queue_has_work(fp->txdata_ptr[cos])) >>> @@ -3187,7 +3187,7 @@ static int bnx2x_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) >>> /* must not complete if we consumed full budget */ >>> if (work_done >= budget) { >>> bnx2x_fp_unlock_napi(fp); >>> - break; >>> + return budget; >> >> This one looks fine. > > But its not necessary, as here budget == work_done. > > (work_done > budget) would be a bug from bnx2x_rx_int() > Yes, I missed that one. This change here is not needed. Thanks