From: mroos@linux.ee
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
shemminger@vyatta.com,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: suspicious RCU usage warnings in 3.3.0
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:55:12 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1204131444150.2736@math.ut.ee> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120412045428.GB2497@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> sparc64: Eliminate obsolete __handle_softirq() function
>
> The invocation of softirq is now handled by irq_exit(), so there is no
> need for sparc64 to invoke it on the trap-return path. In fact, doing so
> is a bug because if the trap occurred in the idle loop, this invocation
> can result in lockdep-RCU failures. The problem is that RCU ignores idle
> CPUs, and the sparc64 trap-return path to the softirq handlers fails to
> tell RCU that the CPU must be considered non-idle while those handlers
> are executing. This means that RCU is ignoring any RCU read-side critical
> sections in those handlers, which in turn means that RCU-protected data
> can be yanked out from under those read-side critical sections.
>
> The shiny new lockdep-RCU ability to detect RCU read-side critical sections
> that RCU is ignoring located this problem.
>
> The fix is straightforward: Make sparc64 stop manually invoking the
> softirq handlers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
It works for me on Sun Fire V100 - no more RCU warnings under ping
flood.
Tested-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
--
Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-13 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-28 8:45 suspicious RCU usage warnings in 3.3.0 Meelis Roos
2012-03-28 21:45 ` David Miller
2012-04-11 15:08 ` Meelis Roos
2012-04-11 23:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-12 0:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-04-12 0:18 ` David Miller
2012-04-12 0:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-12 1:03 ` David Miller
2012-04-12 1:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-12 1:08 ` David Miller
2012-04-12 4:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-13 11:55 ` mroos [this message]
2012-04-13 13:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-13 14:55 ` David Miller
2012-04-13 16:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.SOC.1.00.1204131444150.2736@math.ut.ee \
--to=mroos@linux.ee \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).