From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] team: reject CAN and IEEE 802.15.4 devices in team_port_add
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 11:15:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amnESUrOtl0dXaXk@FV6GYCPJ69> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728151240.89434-1-yaojiale02@163.com>
Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 05:12:40PM +0200, yaojiale02@163.com wrote:
>Enslaving a CAN or IEEE 802.15.4 device (e.g. vxcan, wpan0) to a
>team master triggers a NULL pointer dereference because these
>device types use different Layer 2 architectures from Ethernet and
>the team driver never initializes their private mid-layer data
>structures.
>
>Reject ARPHRD_CAN, ARPHRD_IEEE802154, and ARPHRD_IEEE802154_MONITOR
>devices in team_port_add(), mirroring the existing CAN check already
>present in the bonding driver since commit 8ba68464e478 ("bonding:
>refuse to enslave CAN devices").
Can we perhaps have a unified helper for the check?
>
>Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b58d98e0-8fe3-4e4e-b8a5-c1c7e647ccca@hartkopp.net/
>Fixes: 1d76efe1577b ("team: add support for non-ethernet devices")
>Assisted-by: Claude:deepseek-v4-pro
Looks your ai gone a bit wild here...
>Signed-off-by: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
>---
>V1 -> V2: Extended check to also reject ARPHRD_IEEE802154 and
> ARPHRD_IEEE802154_MONITOR devices per review feedback
>---
> drivers/net/team/team_core.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/team/team_core.c b/drivers/net/team/team_core.c
>index feaa75fbf8fc..d8c46105fc8b 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/team/team_core.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/team/team_core.c
>@@ -1224,6 +1224,17 @@ static int team_port_add(struct team *team, struct net_device *port_dev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
>+ if (port_dev->type == ARPHRD_CAN ||
>+ port_dev->type == ARPHRD_IEEE802154 ||
>+ port_dev->type == ARPHRD_IEEE802154_MONITOR) {
>+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
>+ "CAN and IEEE 802.15.4 devices can't be added as a team port");
>+ netdev_err(dev, "Device %s is CAN or IEEE 802.15.4. These device types can't be added as a team port\n",
>+ portname);
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+ }
>+ }
>+
> if (netif_is_team_port(port_dev)) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device is already a port of a team device");
> netdev_err(dev, "Device %s is already a port "
>--
>2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 15:12 [PATCH v2] team: reject CAN and IEEE 802.15.4 devices in team_port_add Jiale Yao
2026-07-29 9:15 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2026-07-29 12:11 ` jiale yao
2026-08-05 5:00 ` kernel test robot
2026-08-05 15:42 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amnESUrOtl0dXaXk@FV6GYCPJ69 \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yaojiale02@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox