Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost/vsock: keep IOTLB across feature updates
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:02:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <an7KyotZ5vZOURu2@sgarzare-redhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814072903.124991-4-physicalmtea@gmail.com>

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 03:29:03PM +0800, Jia Jia wrote:
>VHOST_SET_FEATURES is also used to update logging while a device is
>running. When ACCESS_PLATFORM stays enabled, allocating a new empty
>IOTLB on every call drops valid translations and forces avoidable
>misses.
>
>Initialize the device IOTLB only when one does not already exist.
>
>Fixes: e13a6915a03f ("vhost/vsock: add IOTLB API support")
>Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
>---
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>index b69c260eaeff..9142fa1143b2 100644
>--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>@@ -869,6 +869,7 @@ static int vhost_vsock_set_features(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, u64 features)
> 	    vsock->dev.iotlb)
> 		vhost_clear_device_iotlb(&vsock->dev);
>

Ah, okay, now I see why you did it in the other patch, but if we move 
dev.iotlb checks in the functions we can still do that.

>-	if ((features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM))) {
>+	if ((features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)) &&
>+	    !vsock->dev.iotlb) {
> 		if (vhost_init_device_iotlb(&vsock->dev))

IIUC vhost_init_device_iotlb() handles the case where dev.iotlb is 
already initialized and override it. Here we are preventing that.

Will we do the same in vhost-net? If yes, all the callers will call 
vhost_init_device_iotlb() with `dev.iotlb` NULL, so should we remove 
that behaviour and add the check we are adding here inside the 
vhost_init_device_iotlb()?

Or there is an use case where vhost_init_device_iotlb() is called with 
an already initialized dev.iotlb ?

Thanks,
Stefano

> 			goto err;
>-- 
>2.34.1
>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14  7:29 [PATCH v4 0/3] vhost/vsock: fix device IOTLB feature lifecycle Jia Jia
2026-08-14  7:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] vhost: add helper to clear device IOTLB Jia Jia
2026-08-14  7:58   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-08-14  7:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] vhost/vsock: discard IOTLB when ACCESS_PLATFORM is cleared Jia Jia
2026-08-14  7:58   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-08-14  7:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] vhost/vsock: keep IOTLB across feature updates Jia Jia
2026-08-14  8:02   ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2026-08-14  7:52 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] vhost/vsock: fix device IOTLB feature lifecycle Stefano Garzarella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=an7KyotZ5vZOURu2@sgarzare-redhat \
    --to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox