From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
Cc: phind.uet@gmail.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Andy King <acking@vmware.com>,
George Zhang <georgezhang@vmware.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>,
syzbot+1b2c9c4a0f8708082678@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
Wupeng Ma <mawupeng1@huawei.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vsock: use sock_error() to consume sk_err after a failed connect
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 11:37:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anGyP3hBQfO0I1Pe@sgarzare-redhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a2958d9-5d16-404a-ac02-21940e90162d@redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 11:26:57AM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
>
>On 7/30/26 10:18 AM, phind.uet@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com>
>>
>> Syzbot report an issue which can be reproduced with these steps:
>>
>> r0 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0)
>> bind(r0, {VMADDR_CID_ANY, PORT})
>> connect(r0, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) -> -1, EPROTO (self-connect)
>> listen(r0, backlog) -> 0
>> r1 = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0)
>> connect(r1, {VMADDR_CID_LOCAL, PORT}) -> 0
>> accept(r0) -> -1, EPROTO (stale sk_err)
>>
>> Basically, it creates a socket (r0) and triggers a self-connect after
>> binding it. This self-connect fails with EPROTO because it loops back to
>> r0 while the socket is still in the TCP_SYN_SENT state, causing it to be
>> incorrectly dispatched to the connecting-client path. The unexpected
>> packet type encountered there sets sk_err to EPROTO.
>>
>> After that, it invokes a listen() call on the same socket. This listen()
>> call succeeds because the kernel's listening path never inspects or
>> clears sk_err. Then, a new socket (r1) is created as a normal client and
>> connects to r0. However, vsock_accept() rejects this incoming connection
>> because the listener's sk_err still holds the EPROTO error from the
>> earlier failed self-connect.
>>
>> This rejection causes the child socket created for r1's connection to
>> never be freed on virtio or hyperv transports; only the VMCI transport
>> implements pending_work to revisit and clean up a rejected socket
>>
>> Fix the issue by using sock_error() to read the sk_err to prevent the
>> rejection branch from occurring in this scenario.
>>
>> sock_error() atomically reads and clears sk_err, ensuring the error is
>> consumed when vsock_connect() returns and cannot affect subsequent
>> operations on the same socket. This matches the established pattern
>> used by other protocol connect() implementations in the network
>> stack like __inet_stream_connect(), tipc_wait_for_connect()...
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+1b2c9c4a0f8708082678@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1b2c9c4a0f8708082678
>> Fixes: d021c344051af ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets")
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyen Dinh Phi <phind.uet@gmail.com>
>> Tested-by: Wupeng Ma <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
>Sashiko nipa points out that the race still exits:
>
>https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260730081843.287563-1-phind.uet%40gmail.com
Yeah, it seems the same conclusion we reached with Michal on v1 and Phi
agreed on: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/148e56ec-dc26-4be2-a7af-eb547b517a68@gmail.com/
Not sure why sk_err check was not removed in vsock_accept.
Phi can you check?
Thanks,
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 8:18 [PATCH v3] vsock: use sock_error() to consume sk_err after a failed connect phind.uet
2026-08-04 9:26 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-08-04 9:37 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2026-08-04 13:52 ` Nguyen Dinh Phi [SG]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anGyP3hBQfO0I1Pe@sgarzare-redhat \
--to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=acking@vmware.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtor@vmware.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=georgezhang@vmware.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mawupeng1@huawei.com \
--cc=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=phind.uet@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+1b2c9c4a0f8708082678@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox