From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0021C238C36; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 17:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785951613; cv=none; b=K7L/WWOnmxl4fMMbc4Iy3dkMe3cDHiGafnPV+DvlfWHOj3HAhNX3hESMRiZxEigVrcK7JbQIJvhB/n1eThhGdmuf74KAuYDAPtCvhfjxSQJIIJo3g0mynXO1KBMchghCYBwz/9x/hB1o+gC1OOlU+vI+iBYUIoYw2y7tjuboc7U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785951613; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uIEhHr5Uq/se3lTE0pFbwYIWFkyW1YxeOf7ixtiTSok=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=G+k4KFmWm+63PZO/8mm74KDvBgFYD3ouyNUiCwGA5IAAkvLay3l44FfBbZP+8dEPw7jS/C78BbCigTMN8Rk31gW/yOES0TXHI2DjikCadhD23b//l3H1uQYuXw+nNaLLjVPH3PymDkOGjmywJVLsves5U6YO/QYUcSw61in71e4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=GxasPuWZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="GxasPuWZ" Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 34B4C6019E; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 19:40:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1785951610; bh=uIEhHr5Uq/se3lTE0pFbwYIWFkyW1YxeOf7ixtiTSok=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GxasPuWZk/nWkhgnd3vlh/3sUSXsu+6kFVMdoLrsXPuX1mGHJhUMXLA4T8vrBq2DK RyINTQzDhEubLyf7JYXbXx6FpSpi0Drq/tsulwaz/nHeBN7g7bBGmHEAAIZqUZUzML 8Th9v3sMYfSC898Ro/wZVCLG4+Z9BTDLyzhbIE+MaJ9cnHFMbVEBf3yT42EHlNRNKZ G9xFhsAKNxVffd06gJLpzr2BXGk2lrClVV6+2LqyNB2vVyX+nfApYWmxF89QTnild3 gXY+Nr5GAQGnmrGqiSphM7uLxkL6w+bvA/HLk587t47JK00UTdfG0VVTqYeIE+GZ5B amGWbNP4+zyzQ== Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 19:40:07 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fw@strlen.de, horms@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/9] Netfilter updates for net-next Message-ID: References: <20260731153402.851224-1-pablo@netfilter.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260731153402.851224-1-pablo@netfilter.org> Hi, After reading sashiko's comment, I think this nf-next PR can be included upstream and the only real issue can be addressed in a follow up. Thanks.