From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: stmmac: improve TSO/GSO queue selection
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:21:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoNfTZbXWCQFjtsn@lore-qca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817094140.0e92f54c@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3006 bytes --]
On Aug 17, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 04:22:37 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > > thx for the pointers. I reviewed Russell's commits and I guess we have two
> > > > options here:
> > > >
> > > > - manages all the TSO/GSO checks in ndo_features_check() (stmmac_features_check())
> > > > and disable TSO/GSO if the selected queue does not support checksum offload
> > > > or it has TBS enabled. In this case I guess we can drop ndo_select_queue()
> > > > callback completely (it does not make sense to me to always use queue 0 for
> > > > TSO/GSO packets, e.g. it does not allow proper mqprio offload).
> > > > Please note this approach would introduce some performance regressions with
> > > > respect of the previous implementation.
> > > > - implements TSO/GSO checks in ndo_select_queue() callback
> > > > (stmmac_select_queue()) in order to keep TSO/GSO enabled if the selected
> > > > queue supports it and at the same time do not always use queue 0 for TSO/GSO
> > > > packets (proper qdisc offload). Please note this is patch I am proposing.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > I don't know this driver, or how it's used.
> > >
> > > From the commit message it sounds like "if the packet wants TSO and
> > > the queue has a scheduler enabled - take the packet to another queue".
> > > Presumably you know why the TBS is enabled and whether the packet
> > > should or should not be going to that queue in the first place if
> > > you're sending the patch? What is the use case?
> >
> > Reviewing the driver codebase, TBS and TSO can't be enabled at the same time
> > for a specific queue (TBS is not enabled via DTS but it is hardcoded in the
> > driver). Moreover, for some devices (e.g. dwmac-intel, dwmac-mediatek, ecc.)
> > TBS is enabled at bootstrap for Q1, Q2 .. Qn, (Q0 is never a TBS queue) while
> > for others (e.g. dwmac-stm32, dwmac-sunxi, ecc.) TBS is not enabled at all.
> > The current codebase forces TSO/GSO packets to Q0 (since the current driver
> > guarantees Q0 is a TSO queue). However this approach does not work with qdisc
> > offload (e.g. mqprio).
> > I think it is clean to just move the TSO logic in ndo_features_check() and drop
> > ndo_select_queue() (previous option 1) but I guess this could introduce a
> > performance regression with respect to the current codebase (we could disable TSO).
> > If we move the TSO logic in ndo_select_queue() (previous option 2), we could avoid
> > forcing the TSO/GSO traffic to Q0 if the selected queue supports it and
> > at the same time avoid any performance regression with respect to the current
> > driver.
>
> Sounds like we don't have a clear understanding of the Intel / TBS use.
> I'd rather risk introducing a regression for them, and have someone who
> actually knows this system help with the fix than accumulate
> incompatible workarounds.
ack, I am fine with that. I will fix it in v3.
Regards,
Lorenzo
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 17:22 [PATCH net-next v2] net: stmmac: improve TSO/GSO queue selection Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-08-12 16:11 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-08-12 23:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-13 20:36 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-08-14 0:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-17 2:22 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-08-17 16:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-17 19:21 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aoNfTZbXWCQFjtsn@lore-qca \
--to=lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox