Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] selftests/xsk: improve shared-UMEM coverage

[Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>]

On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 02:29:20PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 19:53:00 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 10:44:19AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 11:35:53 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:  
> > > > ## Form letter - net-next-closed  
> > > 
> > > these are bpf patches. Tushar, tools/testing/selftests/bpf is BPF  
> > 
> > But AF_XDP is now net target since some time. Should we move the test
> > suite out of bpf directory then?
> 
> True.. but until the move happens it feels a little awkward
> taking pure ksft/bpf patches via net-next?

CC: Bjorn

We had a talk about potential next steps and what would take to get this
test suite executed against HW tests. tl;dr version is that some of the
work is needed to adjust it from infrastructure POV as currently
xskxceiver runs as a single process with two separate threads and what
Bjorn was saying we will rather be needing two standalone processes that
could be used on DUT and packet generator.

Overall we want the xskxceiver's data path logic be reused. LMK if I
missed something.