From: Hangbin Liu <hangbin.liu@linux.dev>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: use skb_cow_head() in bond_do_alb_xmit() and rlb_arp_xmit()
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 17:42:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aplA83k_kZIi1k7w@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902125809.2910366-1-edumazet@google.com>
On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 12:58:09PM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> In bond_do_alb_xmit() and rlb_arp_xmit(), make sure to unclone
> skb head via skb_cow_head() before modifying the source MAC address
> (Ethernet header and ARP payload) to avoid silent corruption if
> the skb is shared or cloned. Avoid caching the header pointers
> across skb_cow_head().
>
> In rlb_arp_xmit(), also check that
> tx_slave != rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave)
> before modifying arp->mac_src. When tx_slave is the active slave,
> arp->mac_src already matches its hardware address, so we can avoid
> an unnecessary copy and head reallocation.
>
> Also, we should not assume mac header is set in output path.
>
> Use skb_eth_hdr() instead of eth_hdr() to fix the issue,
> and remove now redundant skb_reset_mac_header() calls.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> ---
> Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> index 654f051d0023929a48536c378996e0ef39b75d88..5f750f08a144791589b5ed0f44b1b68ab99e6e61 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
> @@ -678,9 +678,13 @@ static struct slave *rlb_arp_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond)
> if (arp->op_code == htons(ARPOP_REPLY)) {
> /* the arp must be sent on the selected rx channel */
> tx_slave = rlb_choose_channel(skb, bond, arp);
> - if (tx_slave)
> + if (tx_slave && tx_slave != rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave)) {
> + if (unlikely(skb_cow_head(skb, 0)))
> + return NULL;
> + arp = (struct arp_pkt *)skb_network_header(skb);
> bond_hw_addr_copy(arp->mac_src, tx_slave->dev->dev_addr,
> tx_slave->dev->addr_len);
> + }
> netdev_dbg(bond->dev, "(slave %s): Server sent ARP Reply packet\n",
> tx_slave ? tx_slave->dev->name : "NULL");
> } else if (arp->op_code == htons(ARPOP_REQUEST)) {
> @@ -1340,7 +1344,6 @@ static netdev_tx_t bond_do_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
> struct slave *tx_slave)
> {
> struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
> - struct ethhdr *eth_data = eth_hdr(skb);
>
> if (!tx_slave) {
> /* unbalanced or unassigned, send through primary */
> @@ -1351,7 +1354,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t bond_do_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
>
> if (tx_slave && bond_slave_can_tx(tx_slave)) {
> if (tx_slave != rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave)) {
> - ether_addr_copy(eth_data->h_source,
> + if (unlikely(skb_cow_head(skb, 0)))
> + return bond_tx_drop(bond->dev, skb);
> + ether_addr_copy(skb_eth_hdr(skb)->h_source,
> tx_slave->dev->dev_addr);
> }
>
> @@ -1375,8 +1380,7 @@ struct slave *bond_xmit_tlb_slave_get(struct bonding *bond,
> struct ethhdr *eth_data;
> u32 hash_index;
>
> - skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> - eth_data = eth_hdr(skb);
> + eth_data = skb_eth_hdr(skb);
>
> /* Do not TX balance any multicast or broadcast */
> if (!is_multicast_ether_addr(eth_data->h_dest)) {
> @@ -1428,8 +1432,7 @@ struct slave *bond_xmit_alb_slave_get(struct bonding *bond,
> u32 hash_index = 0;
> int hash_size = 0;
>
> - skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> - eth_data = eth_hdr(skb);
> + eth_data = skb_eth_hdr(skb);
>
> switch (ntohs(skb->protocol)) {
> case ETH_P_IP: {
> --
> 2.55.0.966.g6673acef38-goog
>
Looks reasonable to me. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@kylinos.cn>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 12:58 [PATCH net] bonding: use skb_cow_head() in bond_do_alb_xmit() and rlb_arp_xmit() Eric Dumazet
2026-09-03 9:42 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2026-09-03 14:09 ` [net] " netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-03 14:17 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aplA83k_kZIi1k7w@fedora \
--to=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox