From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from flow-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (flow-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2932A3E5A29; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 20:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.136 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788468488; cv=none; b=e4dliwE9C3RiwYduu2BXdJb9W4T6KgPyNylGOKd4bf+XSR/9YVQK6pn0aS3/L8WfW6ukzprFZKlBgZBEwuQ9keMsPT05J4JTB/jxjrDwI29QH4JrfwdBADiL0Y6uQ+ASM8L7/Aq/EppSQsFk//1y0EK/o9vV2K6/bVGq7eK3ARI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788468488; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0tVHDldB0byJ87vmnVyBzo1m8ktM7L6UglxhruR5/f0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bdynaIY8FycoxunKgIPKcb3dMvvCtRkwJ3tJozLHCZgF49qVCoDmVuxPL+N7FlhBuUMA4lk9yCb9C8NDnGVOE9nmiqMZe7J/iCiyrnYbcvCifbC9+2HbtBvkxuAkvtwh080pOFx7ArQyFfGL5XZ7yDSGVDL0CuKZM/MmampWcOI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=fastmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fastmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.com header.i=@fastmail.com header.b=LoqpdVHo; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=xr5+svod; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.136 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=fastmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fastmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.com header.i=@fastmail.com header.b="LoqpdVHo"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="xr5+svod" Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailflow.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C0313800CC; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 16:47:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 03 Sep 2026 16:47:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1788468478; x=1788475678; bh=vYh/59ueWC2tCap+cAh5Pc8XIHLmjRhWP4EF7HGivPY=; b= LoqpdVHoHV2WXbeG0Ma8deXG8kWbqjfIDsRmS5QAKBLANiZjMmcOZF2G44wRfhrT q7358SjwplUnzRX2gaBPdXs6vNgXQVxYmB7GPRPELLTUanlDrdzeMqxMQKsFPHRP 9zoUcssP+3izMtkpqDPCOf/dgrGG0qtxNi32ikJKN44gkWRzGzKB0PN3BQg/BIKO Ngx+D4DeNTamsYnDa+f5XUeB9uqxq9yI8pQgXIfjpcKQQkjmQNB7FlEAvi6LrIji lH5BnFSP4SZUmrvni/2t28TgYULBtkALduDaxgsmkmRhS1n88gzSth1iqBQg5jbg L+6bETU0QxcwdqF5Y0HWzg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1788468478; x= 1788475678; bh=vYh/59ueWC2tCap+cAh5Pc8XIHLmjRhWP4EF7HGivPY=; b=x r5+svodN6ruZd+PRXpsu2eqv87HJ6DWONZKBmSiU70zgW8faYOcBTfmVr/Nb0Y3u 9mMKXhd+w+bRejySO8Z7OHPs3s76D6m3jlZzFhmdLcNyGsYxjW6eBPEujOjv4xtf dtJEG2QxWPXJ35cHNXXpUIZ/NyG9MEYOEQwR4Xgme87kSohzOVPH60wVUUGXXIPs Usjah0X8/fcsiyM12/MCOGbtuFlP4y9cLh29+0DG13L/IEpFliJN2mkaUrZWRAxP QrcbgxOHQDHfcKlxp5pik3B+CSfII+yC1jSbqiPsPLgrqQX9ZQDPRbWw6XuYh9zP T8n0XUB2xhdjxLxdcOBKQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: dmFkZTFONURqZfnbz0P41q83IrnEBnUQeLNict9qTZuSYOgw/OZgOGbwAgN8bJfthkkaIV I4hzyFKmUHvWCL397ElXGN6juxpbuSPv7Nm46rxsOsdIPeHkf5vuiSg2JnsW8iLtrPch7N jgTVWDOGoVmZG8jroNefPNoMOcPiyzzLBTFBgoHprYiYJFyeABY1IvrNzRx9zbviTV3xbi aoWfDnz7460xs+RroEtKaeJGRUjNrcAvI4rCpxA2kMdCCNHGpm2bdCRpvUezclo9ePP5QN EGreWD+jZhkGgilHJQMZWdm58IG9xLzST5+2ZxQeB+ObwI1u3Pe9FcSNXI4a2LePdXhgla qG5heHvaxKCWmblHeiaFr/GY+kC6ZqPMn5m5Abt04a9M2zUU6G6LWvmjM7t9JdwP5aY34C BQP7nyIXhyqj/+RWnLdsClEw+FumzAiO8TobK5vzXrVU5jVV2KrN5/KRS+47THK/toj8G/ vUQzzNm5qKRgomk81l/HDbFWKe/flOup7wSGmmtaw3bZKESHjsWLddXpyCg0M5u6ZVM6HF tJ8W2u3487a5XAA9DKeH5pyqXwL32hr1Y/3oe906SbT+WIiuhhpw1TucTl7nJ+lBqRT1zv NEMJvZGzwYdMMXmfc/M6wNgbI20m6jBPUce6KAQHmfgGFgSY/b5yDB8FYExw X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i80b64ba7:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 16:47:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 15:47:56 -0500 From: Juanlu Herrero To: Paolo Abeni Cc: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org, dw@davidwei.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, asml.silence@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org Subject: Re: [net-next,v6,5/6] selftests: net: add multithread server support to iou-zcrx Message-ID: References: <20260831-iou-zcrx-v6-5-02d1d012f0fd@fastmail.com> <178839229706.3394541.1555608492152892136@kernel.org> <1cf3f4de-bec8-4559-a4b2-1d946ead0f69@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1cf3f4de-bec8-4559-a4b2-1d946ead0f69@redhat.com> On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 01:06:11PM -0600, Paolo Abeni wrote: > > > On 9/3/26 1:38 AM, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote: > > Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 6 potential > > issue(s) to consider: > > > > Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 2 (3) · Low: 3 > > > > - [High] listen() is now executed before the workers have registered > > their zcrx ifqs, breaking the ordering that two existing in-tree tests… > > - [Medium] A worker thread that is dispatched zero connections reports > > success without receiving or verifying a single byte. > > - [Medium] The new CQ sizing removes the implicit bound that kept the > > zcrx refill-queue producer inside one ring. > > My understanding is that the above 3 concerns may affect tests stability > and should be addressed before merging. > > Thanks, > > Paolo > makes sense, I will address these in v7 of this patchset. Best, Juanlu