> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential
> issue(s) to consider:
> 
> Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 3
> 
> - [Medium] The new LRO drop path in `airoha_qdma_rx_process()` increments
>   `netdev->stats.rx_dropped` (the legacy `struct net_device_stats`…
> - [Low] The commit message claims "aggregated skbs are marked
>   SKB_GSO_DODGY so that the stack does not rely on gso_size and does not…
> - [Low] Teardown asymmetry for the shared FE/CDM LRO state:
>   `airoha_dev_set_features()` arms the per-QDMA LRO block via…
> - [Low] The new LRO error path performs a plain, non-atomic read-modify-
>   write of the shared per-netdev counter `netdev->stats.rx_dropped++`…
> 
> --
> 
> net: airoha: add LRO offload support
> 
> This adds LRO offload to airoha_eth using the 8 dedicated LRO hardware
> queues mapped to RX queues 24-31, bumping those queues' page_pool order
> since LRO cannot use scatter-gather.  Aggregated skbs get GSO metadata
> and a pseudo-header checksum so forwarded traffic can be re-segmented,
> and NETIF_F_LRO is only offered while a single device uses the QDMA.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260831-airoha-eth-lro-v5-1-6b0f50401121@kernel.org
> 
> A few questions below.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> > index 64619e9a704dd..7035b269a7c34 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > @@ -657,13 +742,146 @@ airoha_qdma_get_gdm_dev(struct airoha_eth *eth, struct airoha_qdma_desc *desc)
> >  	return port->devs[d] ? port->devs[d] : ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int airoha_qdma_lro_rx_skb(struct airoha_queue *q,
> > +				  struct airoha_qdma_desc *desc,
> > +				  u32 msg1, u32 len)
> > +{
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > +	shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> > +	shinfo->gso_type = ipv4 ? SKB_GSO_TCPV4 : SKB_GSO_TCPV6;
> > +	shinfo->gso_type |= SKB_GSO_DODGY;
> > +	shinfo->gso_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(len - data_off, agg_count);
> > +	shinfo->gso_segs = agg_count;
> 
> [Severity: Low]
> Is the commit message description of SKB_GSO_DODGY the right way round?
> It says:
> 
>     "aggregated skbs are marked SKB_GSO_DODGY so that the stack does not
>      rely on gso_size and does not merge the aggregate into the GRO
>      engine"
> 
> SKB_GSO_DODGY means the opposite for gso_segs: it tells the stack that
> gso_segs is untrusted and must be recomputed from gso_size.  In
> qdisc_pkt_len_segs_init() in net/core/dev.c:
> 
> 	if (unlikely(shinfo->gso_type & SKB_GSO_DODGY)) {
> 		int payload = skb->len - hdr_len;
> 		...
> 		gso_segs = DIV_ROUND_UP(payload, shinfo->gso_size);
> 
> and the TCP GSO output path uses gso_size as the MSS when re-segmenting,
> so the approximated gso_size is authoritative rather than advisory.
> 
> The scheme still looks workable, since DIV_ROUND_UP(sum, agg_count) can
> never exceed the largest merged segment and the re-segmented packets only
> come out smaller.  Could the commit message state that rationale instead
> of saying the stack does not rely on gso_size?

ack, I will fix it.

> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > @@ -707,9 +927,17 @@ static int airoha_qdma_rx_process(struct airoha_queue *q, int budget)
> >  			__skb_put(q->skb, len);
> >  			skb_mark_for_recycle(q->skb);
> >  			q->skb->dev = netdev;
> > -			q->skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(q->skb, netdev);
> >  			q->skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> >  			skb_record_rx_queue(q->skb, qid);
> > +
> > +			if (airoha_qdma_lro_rx_skb(q, desc, msg1, len)) {
> > +				netdev->stats.rx_dropped++;
>                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does this counter ever reach userspace?  This driver registers
> .ndo_get_stats64 = airoha_dev_get_stats64, and that callback assigns
> rx_dropped from its own MIB-derived stats:
> 
> 	storage->rx_dropped = dev->stats.rx_drops;
> 
> dev_get_stats() in net/core/dev.c memsets storage and calls
> ndo_get_stats64 when it exists, only falling back to
> netdev_stats_to_stats64(storage, &dev->stats) when there is no
> ndo_get_stats64/ndo_get_stats, and afterwards only adds dev->core_stats.
> 
> So every packet dropped here (agg_count above
> AIROHA_RXQ_LRO_MAX_AGG_COUNT, IPv6 with extension headers so nexthdr is
> not NEXTHDR_TCP, iph->ihl below 5, th->doff below 5, or a frame shorter
> than the headers) appears nowhere in ip -s link or rtnetlink.
> 
> Would dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(netdev), or the driver's own
> dev->stats.rx_drops under its u64_stats syncp, be the better sink here?
> 
> [Severity: Low]
> Separately, can this increment lose counts?  netdev->stats.rx_dropped is
> a plain unsigned long shared per netdev, and this is a non-atomic
> read-modify-write from NAPI context.
> 
> Each RX ring has its own NAPI instance (q->napi, 32 rings across the IRQ
> banks) and the target netdev is resolved per descriptor by
> airoha_qdma_get_gdm_dev(), so two pollers on different CPUs, for example
> LRO rings 24 and 31 both resolving to the same airoha_gdm_dev, can reach:
> 
> 	airoha_qdma_rx_napi_poll()
> 	  airoha_qdma_rx_process()
> 	    netdev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> 
> concurrently with no lock and no per-CPU separation, which also tears on
> 32-bit.

ack, I will fix it.

> 
> > +				dev_kfree_skb(q->skb);
> > +				q->skb = NULL;
> > +				continue;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			q->skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(q->skb, netdev);
> >  		} else { /* scattered frame */
> >  			struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(q->skb);
> >  			int nr_frags = shinfo->nr_frags;
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > @@ -2288,6 +2582,32 @@ int airoha_get_fe_port(struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev)
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > +static netdev_features_t airoha_dev_fix_features(struct net_device *netdev,
> > +						 netdev_features_t features)
> > +{
> > +	struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > +	struct airoha_qdma *qdma;
> > +
> > +	qdma = airoha_qdma_deref(dev);
> > +	if (qdma->users > 1)
> > +		features &= ~NETIF_F_LRO;
> > +
> > +	return features;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int airoha_dev_set_features(struct net_device *netdev,
> > +				   netdev_features_t features)
> > +{
> > +	struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > +
> > +	if (features & NETIF_F_LRO)
> > +		airoha_dev_lro_enable(dev);
> > +	else
> > +		airoha_dev_lro_disable(dev);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> [Severity: Low]
> Should the enable path here be gated on netif_running()?  There is no
> admin-state check, so ethtool -K ethX lro on arms the shared FE/CDM LRO
> block of the QDMA while the interface is still down.
> 
> The only teardown sites for that hardware state are ndo_stop and a later
> ndo_set_features.  unregister_netdev() does not call ndo_stop for an
> already-closed device, and neither airoha_qdma_cleanup() nor
> airoha_hw_cleanup() touches REG_CDM_LRO_EN, REG_CDM_LRO_RXQ or
> REG_CDM_LRO_LIMIT, so after this sequence:
> 
> 	ethtool -K ethX lro on      # link down, LRO armed anyway
> 	rmmod airoha_eth
> 
> the CDM LRO engine stays enabled and mapped to RX queues 24-31 after
> those rings, descriptors and page pools are gone.
> 
> This looks like leftover hardware state rather than something worse:
> airoha_qdma_cleanup() clears GLOBAL_CFG_RX_DMA_EN_MASK and polls
> GLOBAL_CFG_RX_DMA_BUSY_MASK before the RX buffers are released, so no DMA
> into freed pages, and airoha_hw_init() asserts and deasserts the fe reset
> on the next probe before airoha_fe_init(), so the stale enable bits do not
> survive a rebind and cannot make airoha_dev_open() return -EBUSY forever.
> 
> Would it make sense to call airoha_dev_lro_disable() from the remove path
> as well, so enable and disable are symmetric?

I do not think this is necessary since during module probe we reset the device,
disabling LRO.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> -- 
> Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260906-airoha-eth-lro-v6-1-a6cc5179a8c5%40kernel.org