> On Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:43:03 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment() sets XDP_FLAGS_FRAGS_PF_MEMALLOC on the
> > xdp_buff when a fragment page is a pfmemalloc one (page under memory
> > pressure). The xdp_buff is reused for the next frame, but only the
> > XDP_FLAGS_HAS_FRAGS bit was cleared at frame start, so the pfmemalloc
> > bit leaked from one frame into the following ones. mvneta_swbm_build_skb()
> > propagates the flag to skb->pfmemalloc through xdp_update_skb_frags_info(),
> > so the skb of a subsequent fragmented frame could be wrongly marked as
> > pfmemalloc even if none of its pages are under pressure.
> > 
> > Clear all the xdp_buff flags in mvneta_swbm_rx_frame(), which is invoked
> > for each new frame, instead of just the XDP_FLAGS_HAS_FRAGS bit.
> 
> Is there a reason you're not adding the info sinfo bot is asking for?

nope sorry :(. I have just forgot to reply. I will do next time.

Regards,
Lorenzo