From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6091143E9D2; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 08:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790844323; cv=none; b=fpK4f26XtjhJVuE1umlPAtDzZrm1u7bqvz5kpMYsy5VdtZMExhYKfX2Sd38Gb+rGJ6Nn66BRi+hRi/Bqj5Ldr3DvURe5WxXHZS2zkLOzefMl6PhllvAN7LqrXjN8Y25e3jpCYyiR+jynIhdxy4IGMgPiBf277H3A+eK8n3TfoKM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790844323; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IhYylikuF+2eipo20Uj+Q8itlP2GilXlsVODQOqeKT4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SkBVI5u0BHoiW9qcrX396Y9qCM0P2SKeCRoHNJt6tyZGJ/HnfLVTftMWTl/pVZolHnQUWv/JO4pvx3C4f7VWFIuSVfxCS2DnQKGPhHKwLqFQUBAQnVSDcJ64FJ5jZzFTHSjjFnA3XyuYKRCN3vG/KWpLeMem9kLJII+ZUrxyrWM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=RzQ91zJZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="RzQ91zJZ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1790844319; bh=nTa8ZkyRQIbxzuq9Nka8ZFVvCVtpAbM3zarnO5O0pnY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RzQ91zJZyCyvRRHE+PuX3bs9rl/j6gWHxZYJs3TpHXu6LZZblQQuUwHoXq0agALY7 xTXYibrL12Qd4ehQFzw6wwjk5ChES+2VzIRoTB0sgqu6POhfmhPHjLDYBgNtDj/nzN LedNRn9ADsQCeK/x5Ekl75mH/4H2S4+/odHSsce1+Kns7CHEdy0iukvbXaGzgLd2Pl CEDEk0FWDzJxMRMXDvoDRnORMAb/BDQxOv/hmg5rCoiD6RxaYX5LCX+cfDC2nrDxol jdf14ZztT4h/D7HPM+8ImFwPcRzdBPVbc1u7CBkrMm1r7DGDmhQRWMJ5Od3OE4tdpM 0nrqA+Ohrihmg== Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id D11EE60076; Thu, 1 Oct 2026 10:45:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 10:45:15 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Subham Pal Cc: fw@strlen.de, phil@nwl.cc, kaber@trash.net, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] netfilter: nf_conntrack_h323: fixes for NAT bypass and ASN.1 decode Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 10:09:45AM +0530, Subham Pal wrote: > Hi Pablo, > > Just following up to check if there are any remaining questions or queries, > regarding the multi-vendor testbed I described, or if the series is > ready to be applied. I am not sure this is really fixing up anything. If any, this should go to nf-next because this does not crash the kernel.