From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Neal Cardwell" <ncardwell@google.com>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@google.com>,
"Tenzin Ukyab" <ukyab@berkeley.edu>,
"Clément Léger" <cleger@meta.com>,
"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] bpf: tcp: Add kfunc to adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat.
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 13:49:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arGYSbQ97ORDvSBl@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260920195633.3033620-7-kuniyu@google.com>
On 09/20, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq() were added to parse skb and
> adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat dynamically to suppress unnecessary wakeups.
>
> Let's add a new kfunc to set sk->sk_rcvlowat.
>
> Negative values are clamped to INT_MAX, consistent with SO_RCVLOWAT.
>
> For enqueue_rcvq(), wakeup is set to false because:
>
> * tcp_data_ready() is always called after the hooks in
> tcp_queue_rcv() and tcp_ofo_queue().
>
> * when tcp_fastopen_add_skb() is called for TFO SYN, the socket is
> not yet accept()ed, and when called for TFO SYN+ACK, the socket
> is woken up by sk->sk_state_change() anyway.
>
> For dequeue_rcvq(), wakeup is set to true because tcp_data_ready()
> is not called in that path.
>
> An alternative would be to support bpf_setsockopt() for these
> hooks.
>
> However, that approach involves excessive conditionals and an
> unnecessary memcpy(), costs we do not want to pay for every skb
> in the TCP fast path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c
> index b0e14b54917e..3768b1440eb7 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ops.c
> @@ -359,8 +359,62 @@ static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_tcp_ops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> };
>
> +__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
> +
> +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_tcp_ops_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int rcvlowat,
> + const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
> +{
> + u32 moff = aux->attach_st_ops_member_off;
> + bool wakeup = false;
> +
> + if (moff == offsetof(struct bpf_tcp_ops, dequeue_rcvq))
> + wakeup = true;
[..]
> + if (rcvlowat < 0)
> + rcvlowat = INT_MAX;
nit: the same check exists in setsockopt. Any reason not to move it
to your new __tcp_set_rcvlowat ?
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 19:56 [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Add bpf_tcp_ops hooks for TCP AutoLOWAT Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] selftest: bpf: Use BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS + 1 for bad_cb_test_rv Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-21 20:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] bpf: tcp: Introduce bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 21:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 20:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpf: tcp: Support bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() for bpf_tcp_ops Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-21 20:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] tcp: Split out __tcp_set_rcvlowat() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 21:01 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-20 21:12 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-21 20:48 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/7] bpf: mptcp: Don't support BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB_FLAG Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] bpf: tcp: Add kfunc to adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 21:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 20:49 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-09-21 21:36 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-22 7:29 ` Clément Léger
2026-09-20 19:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/7] selftest: bpf: Add test for bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-09-20 21:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 20:50 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-09-22 23:14 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arGYSbQ97ORDvSBl@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com \
--to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cleger@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=ukyab@berkeley.edu \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox