From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@gmail.com>
To: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
Cc: stefanha@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
mst@redhat.com, jasowangio@gmail.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] vsock/virtio: amortize RX socket locking for stream packets
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:15:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <as1b8+vIy8K8J5cN@devvm29614.prn0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261010142247.99223-3-physicalmtea@gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 10:22:44PM +0800, Jia Jia wrote:
> The virtio-vsock RX worker currently acquires and releases the socket lock
> for every received packet. Keep the lock held while processing a bounded
> run of packets that belongs to the same socket.
>
> Only ordinary RW packets for an established STREAM socket whose transport
> and protocol remain unchanged are eligible. Control packets, SEQPACKET
> traffic, state or transport changes, malformed packets, and sockets whose
> protocol has been replaced end the active batch and retain their existing
> handling.
>
> Serialize the initial eligibility check with sk_callback_lock because
> sockmap removal restores the protocol without taking the socket lock.
>
> Limit each batch to 64 packets or 64KB of payload, bounding the work under
> one socket lock. Keep the lookup reference until the batch finishes.
>
> Keep a batch only while another skb metadata charge fits in the receive
> buffer. Share this predicate with virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(). When an
> enqueued skb consumes the final metadata slot, finish the batch and release
> the socket lock before processing another packet, restoring the reader's
> scheduling opportunity from the per-packet path.
>
> The virtqueue callback remains a queue_work() callback. Batching runs only
> in the process-context RX worker.
>
> Introduce virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish() to tear down the batch and
> release the socket lock and lookup reference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 11 ++
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 29 ++++-
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> index f91704731057..26dde6909c4e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> @@ -282,6 +282,17 @@ void virtio_transport_destruct(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
>
> void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
> struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net);
> +
> +struct virtio_transport_rx_batch {
> + struct sock *sk;
> + unsigned int pkts;
> + size_t bytes;
> +};
> +
> +void virtio_transport_recv_pkt_batch(struct virtio_transport *t,
> + struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net,
> + struct virtio_transport_rx_batch *batch);
> +void virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(struct virtio_transport_rx_batch *batch);
> void virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, struct sk_buff *skb);
> u32 virtio_transport_get_credit(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 wanted);
> void virtio_transport_put_credit(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 credit);
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> index 4f9aa9c4c3aa..ef076732158d 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> @@ -629,8 +629,16 @@ virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(struct vsock_sock *vsk, u32 remote_cid)
> return seqpacket_allow;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Keep a bounded run of packets for one socket under a single socket lock.
> + * Limit packet count and payload size to bound the work done while locked.
> + */
> +#define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_RX_BATCH_MAX_PKTS 64
> +#define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_RX_BATCH_MAX_BYTES (64 * 1024)
Why both? Seems like MAX_PKTS would sufficiently bound the lock hold
time.
> +
> static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> + struct virtio_transport_rx_batch batch = {};
> struct virtio_vsock *vsock =
> container_of(work, struct virtio_vsock, rx_work);
> struct virtqueue *vq;
> @@ -666,6 +674,7 @@ static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
> /* Drop short/long packets */
> if (unlikely(len < sizeof(*hdr) ||
> len > virtio_vsock_skb_len(skb))) {
> + virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(&batch);
> kfree_skb(skb);
> continue;
> }
> @@ -673,6 +682,7 @@ static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
> hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> payload_len = le32_to_cpu(hdr->len);
> if (unlikely(payload_len > len - sizeof(*hdr))) {
> + virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(&batch);
> kfree_skb(skb);
> continue;
> }
> @@ -680,16 +690,33 @@ static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
> if (payload_len)
> virtio_vsock_skb_put(skb, payload_len);
>
> + if (batch.sk &&
> + payload_len > VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_RX_BATCH_MAX_BYTES -
> + batch.bytes) {
> + virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(&batch);
> + }
> +
> virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(skb);
>
> /* Force virtio-transport into global mode since it
> * does not yet support local-mode namespacing.
> */
> - virtio_transport_recv_pkt(&virtio_transport, skb, NULL);
> + virtio_transport_recv_pkt_batch(&virtio_transport, skb, NULL,
> + &batch);
> +
> + if (batch.sk) {
> + batch.pkts++;
> + batch.bytes += payload_len;
> + if (batch.pkts >= VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_RX_BATCH_MAX_PKTS ||
> + batch.bytes >= VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_RX_BATCH_MAX_BYTES) {
> + virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(&batch);
I'm not fundamentally opposed to the batch struct, but I wonder if its
needed? If we can get rid of BATCH_MAX_BYTES, then we only need to do
pkts++ in a local var, and can pass an &sk ptr-ptr to
virtio_transport_recv_pkt_batch()?
Best,
Bobby
> + }
> + }
> }
> } while (!virtqueue_enable_cb(vq));
>
> out:
> + virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(&batch);
> if (vsock->rx_buf_nr < vsock->rx_buf_max_nr / 2)
> virtio_vsock_rx_fill(vsock);
> out_nofill:
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index e3e75e59896f..a73e37b3fa62 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -576,10 +576,16 @@ virtio_transport_collapse_rx_queue(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
> skb_queue_splice(&new_queue, &vvs->rx_queue);
> }
>
> +static bool
> +virtio_transport_rx_skb_has_headroom(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs)
> +{
> + return (u64)(skb_queue_len(&vvs->rx_queue) + 1) * SKB_TRUESIZE(0) <=
> + vvs->buf_alloc;
> +}
> +
> static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
> u32 len)
> {
> - u64 skb_overhead = (skb_queue_len(&vvs->rx_queue) + 1) * SKB_TRUESIZE(0);
>
> /* Allow at most buf_alloc * 2 total budget (payload + overhead),
> * similar to how SO_RCVBUF is doubled to reserve space for sk_buff
> @@ -588,7 +594,7 @@ static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
> * queue growth.
> */
> if ((u64)vvs->buf_used + len > vvs->buf_alloc ||
> - skb_overhead > vvs->buf_alloc)
> + !virtio_transport_rx_skb_has_headroom(vvs))
> return false;
>
> vvs->rx_bytes += len;
> @@ -1834,10 +1840,28 @@ struct virtio_transport_rx_pkt_ctx {
> struct net *net;
> const struct sockaddr_vm *src;
> const struct sockaddr_vm *dst;
> + bool *batchable;
> };
>
> +static bool
> +virtio_transport_recv_pkt_batchable(struct virtio_transport *t,
> + struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> + struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs = vsk->trans;
> +
> + return sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED &&
> + sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM &&
> + READ_ONCE(sk->sk_prot) == sk->sk_prot_creator &&
> + !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE) &&
> + vsk->transport == &t->transport &&
> + vvs && virtio_transport_rx_skb_has_headroom(vvs);
> +}
> +
> /*
> - * The caller holds sk's socket lock and must free skb if this returns true.
> + * The caller holds sk's socket lock. Set @batchable if the socket can remain
> + * locked for another ordinary STREAM/RW packet. Return true if the caller
> + * must free @skb.
> */
> static bool
> virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(struct virtio_transport *t,
> @@ -1850,6 +1874,9 @@ virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(struct virtio_transport *t,
> struct net *net = ctx->net;
> bool space_available;
>
> + if (ctx->batchable)
> + *ctx->batchable = false;
> +
> /* Check after acquiring the socket lock. Listener sockets accept packets
> * from any source and are not assigned to a transport.
> */
> @@ -1891,6 +1918,9 @@ virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(struct virtio_transport *t,
> break;
> }
>
> + if (ctx->batchable)
> + *ctx->batchable = virtio_transport_recv_pkt_batchable(t, sk);
> +
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -1941,6 +1971,117 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_transport *t,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_recv_pkt);
>
> +/*
> + * Finish the RX batch.
> + * For a non-empty batch, the caller must hold the socket lock acquired with
> + * lock_sock(). This function releases the lock and the batch's lookup
> + * reference.
> + * An empty batch is a no-op.
> + */
> +void virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(struct virtio_transport_rx_batch *batch)
> +{
> + struct sock *sk = batch->sk;
> +
> + batch->sk = NULL;
> + batch->pkts = 0;
> + batch->bytes = 0;
> +
> + if (!sk)
> + return;
> +
> + release_sock(sk);
> + sock_put(sk);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish);
> +
> +void virtio_transport_recv_pkt_batch(struct virtio_transport *t,
> + struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net,
> + struct virtio_transport_rx_batch *batch)
> +{
> + struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> + struct virtio_transport_rx_pkt_ctx ctx;
> + struct sockaddr_vm src, dst;
> + bool batchable, start_batch;
> + struct sock *sk;
> + bool free_pkt;
> +
> + /* Only STREAM/RW packets can share a socket lock. */
> + if (le16_to_cpu(hdr->type) != VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM ||
> + le16_to_cpu(hdr->op) != VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW) {
> + virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(batch);
> + virtio_transport_recv_pkt(t, skb, net);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + virtio_transport_recv_pkt_init_addrs(skb, &src, &dst);
> + virtio_transport_trace_recv_pkt(skb, &src, &dst);
> +
> + sk = virtio_transport_recv_pkt_find_socket(skb, &src, &dst, net);
> + if (!sk) {
> + virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(batch);
> + (void)virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb, net);
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!skb_set_owner_sk_safe(skb, sk)) {
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "receiving vsock socket has sk_refcnt == 0\n");
> + virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(batch);
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (batch->sk && batch->sk != sk) {
> + /* Never acquire a second socket lock. */
> + virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(batch);
> + }
> +
> + if (batch->sk == sk) {
> + /* Keep the batch reference; drop this packet's lookup reference. */
> + sock_put(sk);
> + ctx = (struct virtio_transport_rx_pkt_ctx) {
> + .net = net,
> + .src = &src,
> + .dst = &dst,
> + .batchable = &batchable,
> + };
> + free_pkt = virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(t, skb, sk, &ctx);
> + if (!batchable)
> + virtio_transport_rx_batch_finish(batch);
> + if (free_pkt)
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + lock_sock(sk);
> + /*
> + * Sockmap removal restores the native protocol under sk_callback_lock.
> + * Serialize this initial eligibility check with that update.
> + */
> + read_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> + start_batch = virtio_transport_recv_pkt_batchable(t, sk);
> + read_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> +
> + ctx = (struct virtio_transport_rx_pkt_ctx) {
> + .net = net,
> + .src = &src,
> + .dst = &dst,
> + .batchable = start_batch ? &batchable : NULL,
> + };
> + free_pkt = virtio_transport_recv_pkt_locked(t, skb, sk, &ctx);
> + if (start_batch && batchable) {
> + /* Keep the lookup reference until the batch is released. */
> + batch->sk = sk;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + release_sock(sk);
> + sock_put(sk);
> + if (free_pkt)
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_recv_pkt_batch);
> +
> /* Remove skbs found in a queue that have a vsk that matches.
> *
> * Each skb is freed.
> --
> 2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-10 14:22 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] vsock/virtio: reduce RX per-packet socket overhead Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] vsock/virtio: split socket lookup from locked RX processing Jia Jia
2026-10-11 14:25 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 21:34 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:24 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-12 22:02 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:26 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] vsock/virtio: amortize RX socket locking for stream packets Jia Jia
2026-10-11 14:25 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 22:15 ` Bobby Eshleman [this message]
2026-10-13 3:28 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] vsock/virtio: reuse same-flow socket lookup in RX batches Jia Jia
2026-10-12 22:17 ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-10-13 3:30 ` Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] vsock/virtio: coalesce RX write-space notifications in lock batches Jia Jia
2026-10-10 14:22 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] vsock/virtio: defer RX readable notifications until batch unlock Jia Jia
2026-10-11 14:25 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 5:51 ` Jia Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=as1b8+vIy8K8J5cN@devvm29614.prn0.facebook.com \
--to=bobbyeshleman@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox