From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46A6F26B742; Wed, 7 Oct 2026 22:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791413881; cv=none; b=OK9I8FP7s1GMsjCPEXtxsMFlQjvyQCGdWb6+G7XQm2vs3jnndnbOvrSCGg9+mluUd8Ce22J426bhuO8qVp2i9nLbliieC6ITZ6Kj8oLv29bKRENWvMyhgJptSi+5tTCR+sNbOd1iBwATdmcfpsza/+dUJlbSWEA+4Gk439qh8Vo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791413881; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8pbsa1UWQxpTLQcNNtAraCqKkjuiKPHk/HGNM8H8EkU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Px5vcDnR9NKdzqAOmbTDfNi1AHatIlSzuu+wU3rymCkE6i76Ti5nZemf2RxwNj6Hpwqq2WAAt1Pr9fx5cqMuzus49Niq8BkvVqnmLYy4MLkaUJxFLfClehTQrKQjq82DAsrTMV6ELBJRdw/9Eqx1zZ+vUIr2hMYJbTFpQheNcfc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=eHuyKtVR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="eHuyKtVR" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1791413878; bh=8pbsa1UWQxpTLQcNNtAraCqKkjuiKPHk/HGNM8H8EkU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eHuyKtVR+NT5eNnvI18WC+CVrciP7/PyhwjK2NwVhJWEHLmtEppHygiuyjs7QIODZ bczu8rHKmvlWi3LbBCC42TUchczEkxlhkyye+AXBxlbxRMmi41v5jjh9VKxmsnnLzH WypuU5mdW0Zi95pQqLYh4p0R/Oo+zQps1MNyCnBDp4iAVoq0ICDgo6It0oX4YPj1oS MQIfcWVQwS7DGOxK+yofccGed3ZoKDSE9bJaPD8N58P/b9vfu0HecCyn3F+N/7lyK7 rywVlFsQ0Nb2tfHa4ZRTGxhbF2ZsrpWRHEIBY5DOcpIex5HitRKXdSkl/JnZvrLjjh YKl2PyFWX0/AQ== Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id D7E5060077; Thu, 8 Oct 2026 00:57:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2026 00:57:54 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: tjdqudcks0424@naver.com Cc: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, phil@nwl.cc, netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: nf_conntrack_reasm: avoid truncating header offset Message-ID: References: <20260929090027.200041-1-tjdqudcks0424@naver.com> <179089937913.434549.5874493628033954656@kernel.org> <20261002074210.140795-1-tjdqudcks0424@naver.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261002074210.140795-1-tjdqudcks0424@naver.com> Hi, On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 04:42:10PM +0900, tjdqudcks0424@naver.com wrote: [...] > Would you prefer this check to be folded into the existing prev_nhoff > patch, or should I submit it as a separate follow-up patch on top of > that change? I have the reproducer, serial logs, A/B results, and an > applyable follow-up patch ready. Please, send a single patch to address these truncation issues. Thanks.