From: Hangbin Liu <hangbin.liu@linux.dev>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
edumazet@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
liuhangbin@kylinos.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] selftests: seg6: move SRv6 End PSP setup into its own helper
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 08:33:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aswq3SlvWG_ydFQR@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179162766399.434549.2048681726157385482@kernel.org>
On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 10:21:03AM +0000, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found more severe
> issue(s) in other patches of this series. This mail is only an FYI, in case
> you want to address the nit picks below when you respin.
>
> Low priority / nit picks for your consideration:
>
> - [Low] The comment in cleanup()
> (tools/testing/selftests/net/srv6_end_flavors_test.sh, lines 328-330)…
>
> --
>
> selftests: seg6: move SRv6 End PSP setup into its own helper
>
> This commit moves the End PSP policy setup out of setup() and into a new
> helper, setup_end_flv_psp(). host_srv6_end_flv_psp_tests() now calls that
> helper with set -e and SETUP_ERR wrapped around it. cleanup() also changes
> so that a setup error only gives SKIP when ret is not already ksft_fail.
>
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/srv6_end_flavors_test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/srv6_end_flavors_test.sh
> > index 30a939392eea4..5ebd6a0344d69 100755
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/srv6_end_flavors_test.sh
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/srv6_end_flavors_test.sh
> > @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ cleanup()
> > # check whether the setup phase was completed successfully or not. In
> > # case of an error during the setup phase of the testing environment,
> > # the selftest is considered as "skipped".
> > - if [ "${SETUP_ERR}" -ne 0 ]; then
> > + if [ "${SETUP_ERR}" -ne 0 ] && [ "$ret" -ne "$ksft_fail" ]; then
>
> [Severity: Low]
> This isn't a bug, but the comment above this condition in cleanup() still
> says that any setup error makes the selftest "skipped". Should it be
> updated to match the new condition?
>
> With this patch, host_srv6_end_flv_psp_tests() starts a second setup
> phase after router_tests and host2gateway_tests have already run.
>
> Suppose one of those earlier tests sets ret to ksft_fail, and then
> setup_end_flv_psp() fails. cleanup() then runs with SETUP_ERR=1 and ret=1.
> The SKIP branch is not taken, and the script exits 1 instead of
> ksft_skip.
This is intend. The test should report failed instead of skip if a test failed.
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 9:58 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] seg6: add End.X PSP flavor support and selftests Hangbin Liu
2026-10-09 9:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] seg6: split final End process out of flavor processing Hangbin Liu
2026-10-09 9:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] seg6: add RFC8986 flavor support for End.X Hangbin Liu
2026-10-10 10:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 0:32 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-10-12 0:59 ` Andrea Mayer
2026-10-12 1:38 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-10-09 9:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] selftests: seg6: move SRv6 End PSP setup into its own helper Hangbin Liu
2026-10-10 10:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 0:33 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2026-10-09 9:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] selftest: seg6: add explicit cleanup for SRv6 End PSP test Hangbin Liu
2026-10-09 9:58 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] selftests: seg6: add End.X PSP selftest Hangbin Liu
2026-10-10 10:21 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 0:47 ` Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aswq3SlvWG_ydFQR@fedora \
--to=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@kylinos.cn \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox