From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.22 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792985486; b=1ntFl9X7TCbi7MvrAHTUfGpAIkPfndcqca4OMOBhIw4rl5JBHbbdJGopOuA/wU1DJAqJ SK1P1P7po7c1IysWgqsI7r5M8AWow6zZvDruUjSq0jpb2Yegq67Erprp8TsGOFRFjlIGQ vSFzJWi9UPVeWtmVCnS1kDiWtu+5leqxGJruzqgh/cqonBqyEbTTpQrsQNr/aGh2Mr1dp /ieE906J+oJN49Bc+DbampOmIzEBGZADV5tWct+lrIADEGCq7Ryt3CYwsTnn4a+ae49O5 CUvobEYteAw4rbYAmCiZnn7u2rXnL4rHy4oMcue4XLyiNcBHp6Mihjy9X0L6p+fP0zQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792985486; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=q0ND4bsI7olG+bcJ2oFCEqAfSxwkslyibAWglvsbmZQ=; b=iTza0ETPW2qyuifOjkTXCMeADF0Pdne4OjVI2Ut52qyYPTq5FnW/uXqJX+bKduo/0YGr GyPmPMIaw0bz+OEEfDCwnm2rIPgY+dDrH0bMyhZkJhR4HMnxr5Kkpx5bJqo4RBy7vYEb5 fPz4M2jwY4YvAIsPJOpnJMF/At5yUsQNrRE6l25tptjhIxhS3plfS4LIHFNP2SKl1Zil0 2bJ0NPNWp8cdomIoMKOZq9btFSjA/3hb7NInRfnPqMe+Eb0yjrMZA/91WhoTF2jMj3c1p SS2wTVSDwP7ARslT9EocMW/MFbEwpAu+6xjvVPvLtXcs9p4reOhEsVUBZeoRWzrtNsw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=Gmuz2rWB; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.22 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-22.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79EA8606A31B for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 03:31:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 79EA8606A31B Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=Gmuz2rWB X-Envelope-To: netdev@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=x39ufFhSR9iF7ouum3UUtIW0rlo3aLIetTlRgwm0ywU=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1792985482; v=1; x=1793590282; b=Gmuz2rWBk3Ztc1ZOnfFHppCvw84/x0H6YLEsjRI8gqEPyf4Xn9h8wsuKqazFHADeKEiK0Ioz UBQrkyd1biq4q9f0hO0Ak+8o7lNI3wUIPITw7iWqOenoVrnMJXaaaNtUiEq1CXhmgwPQ2x27LNz BX4Gje3GmeI3zvGELBfvhjoc= X-Envelope-To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Received: by mta11.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 666ad9eda4df890f; Mon, 26 Oct 2026 03:31:22 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 666ad9eda4df890f X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 11:31:13 +0800 From: Hangbin Liu To: Ido Schimmel Cc: Gabriel Goller , David Ahern , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Nicolas Dichtel , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: Add NETCONFA_FORCE_FORWARDING to netconf messages Message-ID: References: <20261023-ipv6_add_netconfa-v1-1-94d14b07d621@proxmox.com> <20261025131102.GA184152@shredder> X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261025131102.GA184152@shredder> Hi Ido, On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 03:11:02PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2026 at 12:59:18PM +0200, Gabriel Goller wrote: > > Since force_forwarding was added, changing the sysctl sends an > > RTM_NEWNETCONF notification of type NETCONFA_FORCE_FORWARDING, but > > inet6_netconf_fill_devconf() never emits the attribute. Listeners only > > receive NETCONFA_IFINDEX without the new value, and RTM_GETNETCONF > > replies and dumps omit it as well. > > > > Fixes: f24987ef6959 ("ipv6: add `force_forwarding` sysctl to enable per-interface forwarding") > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Goller > > This seems to fall under the "Not a regression, not critical" category > [1], so can wait for net-next. One question about this rule. For "not critical" fixes, should I make that judgment myself and post to net-next? Or should I send them to net and let the maintainers decide whether the fix should go into net or net-next? Thanks Hangbin > > Also, NETCONFA_FORCE_FORWARDING is not emitted when it's disabled as > part of: > > sysctl -wq net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=0 > > Is this intentional? > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHk-=wiSnTE9vBZ=5_v+3EEkdazCCbBM5YABRzRHUAeRdyd4Xw@mail.gmail.com/