From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, sd@queasysnail.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] tcp: do not coalesce segments after FIN
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 19:38:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <au9-QgRUrLwQSDYl@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <au3HMfqNW3_DRMqS@v4bel>
On Fri, 06 Nov 2026 21:25:21 +0900, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> A FIN consumes a sequence number. If another FIN segment is coalesced
> into an skb that already carries FIN, end_seq advances to account for
> the additional FIN, but tcp_flags still contains only one FIN bit.
>
> When the preceding gap is filled and tcp_ofo_queue() processes the
> coalesced skb, rcv_nxt advances to the skb's end_seq. When the receive
> path consumes all data in the skb, copied_seq advances by the data
> length and one sequence number for FIN. If three or more FIN segments
> have been coalesced into one skb, tcp_inq() can still return a positive
> value after the receive queue becomes empty and the SOCK_DONE adjustment
> is applied.
>
> TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE is another consumer affected by this state.
> tcp_zerocopy_receive() takes its length from tcp_inq() and follows
> skb->next without checking for the end of the receive queue.
>
> Software kTLS receive is one consumer affected by this state. When
> strp->copy_mode is false, tls_strp_msg_consume() calls the TCP helper
> tcp_read_done() to consume the current TLS record. In the reproducer,
> tcp_read_done() consumed the record data and one FIN before freeing the
> receive skb.
>
> When kTLS looked for the next record, tcp_inq() reported at least
> TLS_HEADER_SIZE bytes even though the receive queue was empty.
> tcp_recv_skb() returned NULL, so tls_strp_load_anchor_with_queue() hit
> WARN_ON_ONCE() and returned without updating the anchor.
>
> Since tcp_inq() had reported at least TLS_HEADER_SIZE,
> tls_strp_read_sock() proceeded to tls_strp_check_queue_ok().
> skb_shinfo(strp->anchor)->frag_list still pointed to the freed receive
> skb. tls_strp_check_queue_ok() then read TCP_SKB_CB(first)->seq through
> the stale pointer, causing a use-after-free.
>
> The reproducer followed this call path:
>
> tls_rx_rec_done()
> tls_strp_msg_consume()
> tcp_read_done() // frees the receive skb
> tls_strp_check_rcv()
> tls_strp_read_sock()
> tls_strp_load_anchor_with_queue() // returns after WARN_ON_ONCE()
> tcp_recv_skb() == NULL
> tls_strp_check_queue_ok()
> TCP_SKB_CB(first)->seq // reads the freed receive skb
>
> KASAN reported:
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tls_strp_check_queue_ok.isra.0+0x5f/0x100
> Read of size 4 at addr ffff888103169ca8 by task ktls-server/71
> ...
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ...
> tls_strp_check_queue_ok.isra.0+0x5f/0x100
> tls_strp_check_rcv+0x2a9/0x400
> ...
> tls_sw_recvmsg+0x3ce/0xa10
> ...
> sock_recvmsg+0xea/0x100
> __sys_recvfrom+0x142/0x1f0
> ...
> __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x76/0x90
> do_syscall_64+0xdd/0x4a0
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> ...
> </TASK>
> ...
> Freed by task 71:
> ...
> napi_skb_cache_put+0x24/0xf0
> skb_attempt_defer_free+0x183/0x3b0
> tcp_read_done+0x2d4/0x340
> tls_strp_msg_consume+0x45/0x80
> tls_sw_recvmsg+0x3c4/0xa10
> ...
>
> In tcp_try_coalesce(), skip coalescing when the destination skb already
> carries FIN. tcp_add_backlog() calls skb_try_coalesce() directly instead
> of using this helper, so add the same check there. Since both paths check
> only the destination skb, a final segment carrying data and FIN can still
> be coalesced into an skb without FIN when the other coalescing checks pass.
>
> Fixes: e93a0435f809 ("tcp: allow segment with FIN in tcp_try_coalesce()")
> Fixes: 4f693b55c3d2 ("tcp: implement coalescing on backlog queue")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 12:25 [PATCH net v2] tcp: do not coalesce segments after FIN Hyunwoo Kim
2026-11-06 13:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-11-07 19:38 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2026-11-10 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=au9-QgRUrLwQSDYl@google.com \
--to=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox