From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.51 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793345183; b=yGwfj3BSbW870lsQNlwRS3uaqL4iUwVzDIx91djkWgDRwMA1U+by9ONPrQV7iIMRgznk LJNVcaKeRH+pZ0oDhge0u4TFCPbw+3trw8XvBwWg01nUclHsDxXdhCHPoNKCV/4v8oW8U 5U9Fm9a2oGxcclIAMsUF0z4teVH9ploiYtlhzJOsi6t3/9dv9Lfuo4J32IGpjLlYiwuvJ VONxRreF7M37BmYke+FdnnOPonqSm7KPyKj4EF09qRLt9rzVu5qOPoGqaLnAgY9AY8Km8 ErgT3gEj66t/pmMxppLWIu6+/fxCapWhnLzV4ZEfsQpJvRncTyk99nSEL9qt059rsPQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793345183; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To; bh=NyT4TGT6hgIR8kPb90iUAjfgRkiqKdm9uwcXklqZWrs=; b=Z0YAFdbr99Emf7vrNAa8HiBUxGdrZDSN+Ei2UW/v4f+LGIAxhCvG3mzxWQvOP4v/fYtS +SM7Kn9nZzPDohz8QRKhuwRCdumoNJNyHEuX3hg6TyBlmShFOKFQlP1DKFmofk0zmp+82 IYW1ELza7CTU3NZxD06FHmY1cEe0jgPuY9M7WwT8W8k0c/GIsRpxxar/PLS8960Kj7YvA 0DabE8na7QtfuuNjD3KgrVrAE5lnJaUC2Qb2XRqyKeksHXUEWHmzoimSU8bTQT6Y0zPug Gh8HyqfL4socIw7gt0yELJfyJXH/9q1PPA4kwNj51n2UO6rLjjMUjLgc8YYGovNmOwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=Wne11m5w; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.51 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-51.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72CFD606A31D for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2026 07:26:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 72CFD606A31D Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=Wne11m5w X-Envelope-To: netdev@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=o1OkAFsPF7Db+QblpcO5qVWk9d0XdGrhsF15SUMl9TM=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1793345179; v=1; x=1793949979; b=Wne11m5w8ibnL/tbl4S/kdc+uich8+U+kfITNaoD4FsK/4eMwQJaCUMHwwqHPOijy7nf+vbV YpSGTLuKHu+tAubORY8F/X981+YI8h5iG/SC8cB8QKQ2o4Fq082z8P2Ns3R6/LOMyuEtx2/MnAa IHocC8lvDB9StmEMKkLTWFlo= X-Envelope-To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Received: by mta12.migadu.com with ESMTPS id e84fa612ede8427d; Fri, 30 Oct 2026 07:26:18 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: e84fa612ede8427d X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 15:26:04 +0800 From: Hangbin Liu To: Mina Almasry Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D6mer?= Mete Kaya , Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Joas Antonio dos Santos , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Jiri Pirko , syzbot+88435e204734072bf39a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] netdevsim: reject port addition and clean up ports after a failed reload Message-ID: References: <20261030001444.289973-1-omermetekaya0@gmail.com> <20261030064245.4118081-1-almasrymina@google.com> X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20261030064245.4118081-1-almasrymina@google.com> On Fri, Oct 30, 2026 at 06:42:45AM +0000, Mina Almasry wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2026 at 2:05 AM Hangbin Liu wrote: > > > > Looks Joas has a same issue fix with yours a few hour earlier. > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/179324296598.34505.11070163314749859668@gmail.com/ > > > > > --- > > > Tested with syzbot C reproducer. > > > v2: drop Cc:stable and target net-next. > ... > > But yours have an extra guard in nsim_drv_port_add... > > > > Leave this to Jakub decide... > > I prefer Ömer's version. Once reload_down has torn down the device and > reload_up has failed, the device is in an uninitialized state, so > rejecting new_port in nsim_drv_port_add() makes more sense than > allowing ports/netdevs to be registered on a half-torn-down nsim_dev > and only cleaning them up later. +1 Thanks Hangbin