From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>,
Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] tcp: wait for TIME_WAIT teardown before freeing per-netns ehash
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 02:39:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auVUox0QAYELIm3b@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261030075843.2567707-1-edumazet@kernel.org>
On Fri, 30 Oct 2026 08:58:43 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>
>
> inet_twsk_kill() removes a TIME_WAIT socket from the established hash
> before it finishes using the ehash lock, hashinfo and bind tables, and
> before it drops the death-row reference. A running timer can therefore
> unhash its socket before inet_twsk_purge() reaches it. The purge cannot
> synchronize with that timer, and tcp_sk_exit_batch() can free the
> private ehash and hashinfo while inet_twsk_kill() is still using them.
>
> An unprivileged reproducer using user and network namespaces, a private
> TCP ehash and a FIN_WAIT2 timer triggers a KASAN slab-use-after-free in
> inet_twsk_kill(). The allocation and free stacks point to
> inet_pernet_hashinfo_alloc() and inet_pernet_hashinfo_free().
>
> Wait for an RCU grace period after purging the whole batch, if one
> netns in the batch uses a private ehash. TIME_WAIT removal runs with
> bottom halves disabled, so this also waits for removers that were
> already invisible to the purge. Keep the wait under
> tcp_exit_batch_mutex, before freeing any private hashinfo.
>
> The same window exists with the shared tcp_hashinfo. There, the
> hashinfo memory stays valid, but tcp_sk_exit_batch() can decrement
> tcp_death_row.tw_refcount from 2 to 1 before inet_twsk_kill() drops its
> own reference. This triggers the WARN_ON_ONCE() in tcp_sk_exit_batch(),
> then a refcount_t "decrement hit 0" warning from inet_twsk_kill().
>
> Adding a grace period for the shared case would be costly on busy
> hosts. It is not needed: struct net is freed by a later cleanup_net(),
> after the synchronize_rcu() in ops_undo_list(), so inet_twsk_kill()
> can safely drop the last tw_refcount reference itself.
> Use refcount_dec_if_one() and only warn if tw_refcount is not 1
> after a grace period.
>
> Fixes: d1e5e6408b30 ("tcp: Introduce optional per-netns ehash.")
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>
> [edumazet: only call synchronize_net() if one netns in the batch uses a private ehash,
> use refcount_dec_if_one() to avoid a false WARN with the shared ehash]
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>
> ---
> Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
> ---
> v2: [edumazet]
> Avoid a false WARN_ON_ONCE() in tcp_sk_exit_batch() when a concurrent
> inet_twsk_kill() still holds a tw_refcount reference, as reported by
> Jiayuan Chen and Sashiko. Use refcount_dec_if_one() and only warn
> after a grace period, instead of adding synchronize_net() for the
> shared ehash, which would be costly on busy hosts.
>
> When net-next reopens, I plan to free the private hashinfo after
> an RCU grace period (call_rcu()), so that tcp_sk_exit_batch() no
> longer needs synchronize_net(). This would also cover request
> sockets and RCU lookups that could still touch a private ehash.
Sounds good, thanks !
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-31 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 7:58 [PATCH v2 net] tcp: wait for TIME_WAIT teardown before freeing per-netns ehash Eric Dumazet
2026-10-30 8:45 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-10-31 2:39 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auVUox0QAYELIm3b@google.com \
--to=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kylebot@openai.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox