Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: <netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	<stfomichev@gmail.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>, <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
	<bjorn@kernel.org>, <zuomao338@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/9] xsk: ZC mbuf fixes
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 14:18:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auiNskjiMPHTHsf4@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179362404207.3286.3886474571191338888@kernel.org>

On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 12:54:02PM +0000, netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
> commit messages seem to be missing some information:
> 
>  - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
>    (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
>    the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.

whole series started from report at security ML which included KUnit
reproducer and I verified the issue is real and could be hit with ZC
driver. Part of oops is included in commit message in patch 1.

> 
>  - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please
>    mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for
>    testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware.

Ran xskxceiver's test suite via xsk.py runner on Intel E810-C (ice driver
fw revision 4.70). It does not cover the duplicate fill ring entries but
given the changes based on code inspection this run was to make sure I did
not introduce any regressions around multi-buffer logic.

> 
> Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
> reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
> can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
> other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
> then.
> 
> The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
> that is the case please reply and explain.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-02 12:49 [PATCH net 0/9] xsk: ZC mbuf fixes Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 1/9] xsk: fix list corruption in xsk_buff_add_frag() Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-03 13:32   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:24     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 2/9] i40e: xsk: fix xsk_buff_add_frag() error handling in Rx Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-03 13:32   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 16:29     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 3/9] ice: xsk: fix leaking Rx buffers in multi-buffer path Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-03 13:32   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-03 17:22     ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 4/9] ice: xsk: do not free in-flight frags on XDP_TX completion Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 5/9] libeth: " Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-03 13:32   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 6/9] xsk: do not clear frags flag when acquiring a buffer Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-03 13:32   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 7/9] i40e: xsk: fix multi-buffer XDP_PASS skb construction Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 8/9] ice: xsk: free stashed Rx frame when cleaning the ring Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-02 12:49 ` [PATCH net 9/9] idpf: free stashed XSk Rx frame when releasing the queue Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-11-03 13:32   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-02 12:54 ` [PATCH net 0/9] xsk: ZC mbuf fixes netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-11-02 13:18   ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-11-03  4:48 ` Björn Töpel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auiNskjiMPHTHsf4@boxer \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
    --cc=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
    --cc=zuomao338@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox