From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793715048; b=iwORk6GL7p4Nn7IqHhJm6+S2z7sz0WJV+CD3aDeTv/XtATnCNdYpCNUy6rKiR/PUwhBp e1+5Aoi9czet+F34odQIa0G6NYenJO4TiMsAp2rE0k1lunJ4qlSZofUmP7jmCHUa/1KKf 5VcK3TA2hmT+NGD8c7mcI/L9X4iF9mM8UkCMerjw+NRqU5Dk4EZ0QPG4Nuuym672LKe1Y 9dEkOE8RXeVEcOTgx3KZhS7N59mCUpLaLUIu1hrtdxK94u20+dbZqWfod+h1GjXvRt3P9 WiY14HWszF+P3DYaUhMTRH50tEYfveuWboCTbuS83POX3HV0jEZ5xoOe06jeF7KB9JA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793715048; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To:X-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Checker-Version; bh=FsqjxlqG8u1XDqlLty8eerFOgEp04Ke+7TabMLXwYYA=; b=cVen1Imz1aubeCceQBwjfvXPlu1dyZgWqH02irtiNHL0g8KNgAiT5wntKc6EaTd67oeH E1GDjw6hqyt68zKSVgWXUbb8OdxGelMcmvaxZb8JxVQdnn/qPTolwviN2SIaNRKbNXjuJ R8uBcABjPL32RHVPaBDQyqfJMTVP+jp45kOKP5sJcvDls/1PbNGE4AYL2CGnUC8AlSJZM Yp28JJhVAPaCDkqU9Nnwm0xOVsn+oFXj60eMphulC/SZE0Iq48W/nje6ejQlLY+lyRxHP hEVI7koxGaDkR08c7r70tD+eOeLrmbUp38j1cNHHSkcMXsZjGBpPFhtuuze0gwy3Sxw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2025 header.b=SuQfjuMt; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.70.190.124 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id 9E5DC606A32F; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 14:10:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 9E5DC606A32F Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2025 header.b=SuQfjuMt DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1793715045; bh=FsqjxlqG8u1XDqlLty8eerFOgEp04Ke+7TabMLXwYYA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SuQfjuMtAqFkcqInvUzT8G9JyL1h9ou2AGfCHafVGm2gqFJ64V5EbfISkR95krjJ2 MTVU2qjDXBJwKASMx6DnFkOmoMcQ6JontpHRQySXzKu/F/r4HC7n9+mtvGfUKtJ9Ii hJ4zdYXY8fh+r3C0IluR5x9eZYhUv0y9glWbbJSkX4VXrGtKJlMEwwyP8DpH1qZfzy zXnwfV8tlFdbFLNms1WHti5IBKKDHR7/l2NMGiwi+357mAH+JYdBIwaK4dwbQtZ0Fr xfz+m+aaJapEY1xCui9Ss4KkdcQmCZ0l/kFR+ODpsLETkgu5x98DYpxQYZrWCMKwfU +Y7K5cMg7iSKA== Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id 5A78B6008B; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 15:10:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 15:10:42 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, ja@ssi.bg Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: flowtable: do not scrub as crossing netns Message-ID: References: <20261103140308.591690-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20261103140308.591690-2-pablo@netfilter.org> <179371488692.488859.8707984454002960043@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <179371488692.488859.8707984454002960043@kernel.org> On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 02:08:06PM +0000, netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote: > Hi! > > This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its > commit messages seem to be missing some information: > > - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical > (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include > the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. > > Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, > reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers > can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for > other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages > then. This came from ... :drum-roll: ... a LLM unrelated report, providing with a patch that was not looking very good, but I could scavenge this subtle aspect from that pile. > The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think > that is the case please reply and explain.