From: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>
To: Naman Gulati <namangulati@google.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: fix Rx payload buffer leak when header buffer allocation fails
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 18:14:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aut0VPowjLkQL5Oe@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104013606.1527767-1-namangulati@google.com>
On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 at 01:36:06AM +0000, Naman Gulati wrote:
> With header split, idpf_rx_update_bufq_desc() allocates the payload
> buffer for a buffer ID first and its header buffer second. If the header
> buffer allocation fails, it returns -ENOMEM and leaves the new payload
> buffer in bufq->buf[buf_id]. idpf_rx_clean_refillq() then stops without
> consuming the refill queue entry, and the next NAPI poll retries the
> same buffer ID, again starting with the payload buffer.
> libeth_rx_alloc() overwrites bufq->buf[buf_id], and the earlier payload
> buffer is never returned to its page_pool.
>
> Each such failure leaks one payload buffer. The pool's inflight count
> never drops to zero, so when the queues are re-created or the device
> goes away, the pool never finishes shutting down and
> page_pool_release_retry() keeps warning about a stalled pool shutdown.
>
> This happens when the header buffer pool runs dry while the payload pool
> still has pages, for example under memory pressure: a header page holds
> several header buffers and only goes back to its pool once the skbs
> using all of them have been freed.
>
> Release the payload buffer when the header buffer cannot be allocated,
> as ice_alloc_rx_bufs() already does, so that the retry starts from an
> empty slot. idpf_rx_page_rel() also clears the slot, so the buffer queue
> teardown cannot release the buffer a second time.
>
> Fixes: 90912f9f4f2d ("idpf: convert header split mode to libeth + napi_build_skb()")
> Signed-off-by: Naman Gulati <namangulati@google.com>
Tested on an idpf PF (8086:11df), net-queue dev-queue (da74aaf50018),
TCP data split on, 16 TCP flows of Rx traffic:
1. A local debug hook makes the header libeth_rx_alloc() in
idpf_rx_update_bufq_desc() return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR on every 20th
call, 2000 times in total.
2. Recreate the Rx queues: ethtool -G eth1 rx 1024; ethtool -G eth1 rx 2048
3. After 120 s, check with tools/net/ynl/ynltool: ynltool page-pool stats
Without the patch:
eth1[3] page pools: 253 (zombies: 13)
refs: 150913 bytes: 618139648 (refs: 2000 bytes: 8192000)
With the patch:
eth1[3] page pools: 240 (zombies: 0)
refs: 152521 bytes: 624726016 (refs: 0 bytes: 0)
One page stuck per forced failure without the fix (2000), none with it.
Tested-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> index 885df6294ad94..7383d8241ead5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> @@ -3745,8 +3745,10 @@ static int idpf_rx_update_bufq_desc(struct idpf_buf_queue *bufq, u32 buf_id,
> fq.truesize = bufq->hdr_truesize;
>
> addr = libeth_rx_alloc(&fq, buf_id);
> - if (addr == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR)
> + if (addr == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
> + idpf_rx_page_rel(&bufq->buf[buf_id]);
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> buf_desc->hdr_addr = cpu_to_le64(addr);
>
> --
> 2.56.0.398.g882cbad275-goog
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 1:36 [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: fix Rx payload buffer leak when header buffer allocation fails Naman Gulati
2026-11-04 1:38 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-11-04 1:49 ` Naman Gulati
2026-11-04 18:14 ` Brian Vazquez [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aut0VPowjLkQL5Oe@google.com \
--to=brianvv@google.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=namangulati@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox