From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793881750; b=2jIU4QMB/hydCdaqvn2kqYu5rHUbiZwhii4yWVYNgtqOmN8OsdH7K8/MnQeRKBQ1Hbt9 I4nfc/uadO/Y0+WhAwcSeqiGwqZlkmJ0Vk6cg6S+v/2wQvZHIpseNTsY+F+E5jI76X++f Ypk0SyuAVI4g9xDRqlxPqPhRHKfyLVEO2RrA5SKS4wox/RXJI3yKuGQ5fvFhPV/stLcBk NnO/86wQWo7BqFaD2o8RvHD47sq0VPr0t3MEtt2j5b+NvxujlvNpDiMY9pTDLxoK9Qtgb ZsLOVilKIZekqllYCqjF3Rff2XQXSStyEmBoZcpm8qwV94KyEMNsGszS9YaL4CiopJA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793881750; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To:X-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Checker-Version; bh=L/wCDZTny+Lvo3Lr7G5P7WIRmymnjKm8RubBMyE/Vws=; b=WyQqo4Pm7BqLzfr44jKTdaKOyykO534S0WoYM249vbCVg7i3pHgUh/7X2os4+JDNMm5N dpu8oiZ27jWhrxYF4XkM1bbG/W+qorUVtIYW7NzMgrXOvB6GfvcJ20a/vTLh3ddxNEzkM 7rNbJmWjAflmpGxfUY8Ljc/8tXVIGEQs11T/LOa0Np8SZrrIdt4wTuFc+SQ5b74PR+5gg TlR3T4cp5Kco9B9XgIT09khjbPRQlifxbueluaNE85uYqyLA4PYJ5w07Zkbi/LdAXCzdm FZ/7DJoisK9hvjacvrTcWJdy7ClGhI3GluQSb+nhhkNy/kWlAwNhv18uf5X+1CuptSA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2025 header.b=HtTZbiF1; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=217.70.190.124 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPS id D6594606A326; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 12:29:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org D6594606A326 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2025 header.b=HtTZbiF1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1793881745; bh=L/wCDZTny+Lvo3Lr7G5P7WIRmymnjKm8RubBMyE/Vws=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HtTZbiF1xVeDEHJ+P0DUkkXecJufRpNGTpLjtyETBMWmm+Gu9yyfDGSiijvznxSDw mSCk6pCuax6YfauJmYoDc3dWZlYdc7qbXuq/7kLWZCfJeyXIKYQ40TueiPC939vqHs ZyCEVCV9XuoY+guCMVDIsvj/8bCyXP9APLGGwABy/QZHWnPZcSvRauWS8dr0oGyJ3r y9f4MtawcCMVnkxql1DVIwdikAjxlJNYui0g2kVJ7m45ibFsijnpCCnxF+QasCMpH1 YCZM47Y4We0h2hr+cmMTm1s2ad1ojgcmLG1uAeSOljUgOUonuOERa+DUCb/9iBkZg2 XM9i3t/REaE7g== Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTPSA id CCDA8604FA; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 13:29:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 13:29:03 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Paolo Abeni Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, ja@ssi.bg Subject: Re: [PATCH net,v3 00/13] Netfilter/IPVS fixes for net Message-ID: References: <20261104090224.750548-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <51aa2527-0a99-4d67-845a-a8b28f822efb@redhat.com> X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51aa2527-0a99-4d67-845a-a8b28f822efb@redhat.com> On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 10:46:46AM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On 11/4/26 10:02, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > v3: keep back two patches in the series with sashiko reports that > > suggest they need a bit more work. > > I *think* Julian additionally suggested dropping/changing patch > > ipvs: do not create conns from packets with port 0 > > but it looks untouched ?!? I would suggest Julian follows up on this specific patch. But I can drop it too. > Also AI review did not kick on this revision, likely because > the bot is confused by the mismatch between cover letter prefix > "net,v3" and the patches prefix "net". > > I think a new revision may be needed? I can send a v4, of course.